unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stuart Hungerford <stuart.hungerford@gmail.com>
To: John Mastro <john.b.mastro@gmail.com>
Cc: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Antialiasing problems with light text on a dark background (OS/X 10.10)?
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 08:26:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG+kMrEGcAVwEP216dSjUWxZ_aw3g5AEGoj0oz3icK6GKNxdhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOj2CQRAta7YLeVo=KxLN_+969A98ujnD7QjK_hFKBFh_E86WA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 7:32 AM, John Mastro <john.b.mastro@gmail.com> wrote:

> Stuart Hungerford <stuart.hungerford@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've been trying out Emacs installed through Homebrew on OS/X 10.10
>> (both the standard Gnu version and the Emacs-mac variant).
>>
>> Using light text on a near black background the text is rendered very
>> bold and thick.  The same font (Inconsolata opentype) in the same
>> colors and the same text looks much thinner with Terminal.app and
>> Sublime Text. I've also discovered this bug report which I think is
>> still open:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2014-10/msg01082.html
>>
>> Has anyone else experienced this issue?  Are there any work-arounds I'm missing?
>
> My read of that bug report is that the reporter believed that setting
> the normal font got them the bold one and vice versa.
>
> If that's correct, and is the same thing affecting you, you could work
> around it somewhat by setting the bold font, thereby getting the normal
> one.
>
> Not a perfect workaround, but maybe an improvement over the status quo.

Thanks for replying--much appreciated.

My experience has been that both normal weight and bold weight fonts
are way too thick and bold (compared with other OS/X applications), so
I took that bug report to indicate something is wrong with emacs font
antialiasing on OS/X even though my experience is slightly different.

I've found that Adobe Source Code Pro has an "extra light" weight
which I'm using for now, but would prefer to stick Inconsolata if I
can.

Thanks,

Stu



      reply	other threads:[~2015-08-14 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-14 19:48 Antialiasing problems with light text on a dark background (OS/X 10.10)? Stuart Hungerford
2015-08-14 21:32 ` John Mastro
2015-08-14 22:26   ` Stuart Hungerford [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAG+kMrEGcAVwEP216dSjUWxZ_aw3g5AEGoj0oz3icK6GKNxdhg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=stuart.hungerford@gmail.com \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=john.b.mastro@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).