* package.el: Optional *maximum-version* flag for dependencies?
@ 2014-07-02 13:33 Andrew Pennebaker
2014-07-02 13:55 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pennebaker @ 2014-07-02 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Emacs Help
When a dependency breaks (nlinum v1.4 :P ), it would be good to have some
way to hold back the version (v1.3), until a fix is released.
Could there be an optional *maximum-version* argument when specifying
dependencies?
--
Cheers,
Andrew Pennebaker
www.yellosoft.us
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: package.el: Optional *maximum-version* flag for dependencies?
2014-07-02 13:33 package.el: Optional *maximum-version* flag for dependencies? Andrew Pennebaker
@ 2014-07-02 13:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-07-02 14:16 ` Grant Rettke
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2014-07-02 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
> Could there be an optional *maximum-version* argument when specifying
> dependencies?
For dependencies between packages, no we don't offer that.
The closest we have is the ability for the end-user to "pin"
a particular version (see package-pinned-packages).
Stefan
PS: I can't remember hearing complaints about breakage in nlinum-1.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: package.el: Optional *maximum-version* flag for dependencies?
2014-07-02 13:55 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2014-07-02 14:16 ` Grant Rettke
2014-07-02 14:52 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Rettke @ 2014-07-02 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Emacs Help
Was that function renamed in v24?
I can't find it. I web searched that it was suggested that
package-pinned-packages is replaced by package-desc-reqs.
Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM
gcr@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
“Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
“Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
taking it seriously.” --Thompson
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> Could there be an optional *maximum-version* argument when specifying
>> dependencies?
>
> For dependencies between packages, no we don't offer that.
> The closest we have is the ability for the end-user to "pin"
> a particular version (see package-pinned-packages).
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
> PS: I can't remember hearing complaints about breakage in nlinum-1.4.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: package.el: Optional *maximum-version* flag for dependencies?
2014-07-02 14:16 ` Grant Rettke
@ 2014-07-02 14:52 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2014-07-02 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
> Was that function renamed in v24?
Ah, no, apparently it's new in the upcoming 24.4.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-02 14:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-02 13:33 package.el: Optional *maximum-version* flag for dependencies? Andrew Pennebaker
2014-07-02 13:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-07-02 14:16 ` Grant Rettke
2014-07-02 14:52 ` Stefan Monnier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).