From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Gnus + emacs.stackexchange Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 10:15:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87fv7hoxnd.fsf@debian.uxu> <87mw1luz3o.fsf_-_@debian.uxu> <87a8xjpxdh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ioc61r9c.fsf@debian.uxu> <87twvq82ou.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pp6d7bb4.fsf@debian.uxu> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430990149 12309 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2015 09:15:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 09:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 07 11:15:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YqHuF-0000GU-Jk for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 11:15:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqHuE-0004La-V5 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 05:15:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqHtv-0004LK-1X for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 05:15:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqHtt-0001f2-Ql for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 05:15:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]:33715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqHtt-0001eW-Et for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 05:15:25 -0400 Original-Received: by lbbzk7 with SMTP id zk7so26398939lbb.0 for ; Thu, 07 May 2015 02:15:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u7GwEzjXOpbIjuNfZ8u3WbyB/rGDzBipIjQcbgAOTEw=; b=02Kbr/EQ5X7c4L4xHUx6f0uzLadsF5hC3PJMGUkSWFduVhqWq3CAUjbJb+0MmlisVo iUhEIy6552bT5sn4uzc/MPQs7oU1kJEyoG5oo0vVpeQUXZKcTXq7VfybmlwXwFnqXmX0 cyQRwX4JgAVWLI98ORJME6Gvy+j+HVCb4LkbG9quVzDr5kwLT/CR3K+/uFXM3M7d/VBc wP+HXqkTALCofiiBefxljf/tDCB91EdpPYoXwNZGUBTTUZ8LXnWSz9u6jMxvnoRHhxbH AsCJ08/6FjzM5TlEUT31GpRDXg4CvSEn2s/RFpczxmk9eYkCZUvicEa9LaHbEW3i34vA e08g== X-Received: by 10.152.87.204 with SMTP id ba12mr2304199lab.35.1430990124570; Thu, 07 May 2015 02:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Thu, 7 May 2015 02:15:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87pp6d7bb4.fsf@debian.uxu> X-Google-Sender-Auth: -X8u2363C8Qo5WzBVSaTOMddUNc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:104263 Archived-At: > Indeed, the participation would be needed. So start > with the Emacs SX! But the sx.el people already did it > (tho I didn't got it to work myself). But because they > already did it (not NNTP perhaps but something to the > extent of what we discuss) It's the Stackexchange API. > I'd say the "all-in", > nested thread post/comments blog idea is more > interesting and beneficial to the Gnusers around the > world... I've toyed with the idea of combining sx.el with some sort of mailbot, so that each question on Emacs.stackexchange gets sent to some list, and if people reply to that list the bot would post the reply to the site (using sx.el). Issues with this are: 1) I've no idea how (and no time) to write a mailbot. 2) It would have to be VERY smart about which replies it posts and be moderated. The SX API has a very incisive =E2=80=9CQuality of Content=E2=80= =9D clause, which indicates the bot might get banned quickly if it's just posting random comments everywhere. 3) On SX, it's possible to call's someones attention by directly @naming them. I'm not sure how the bot would handle these notifications. I think the only answer would be someone with a lot of common sense (possibly the same who moderates item 2), would manually check all notifications.