* make frame(s)
@ 2007-08-26 17:17 trajan
2007-08-26 18:04 ` Peter Dyballa
2007-08-26 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: trajan @ 2007-08-26 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
Hello,
I am trying to open a new frame within the Emacs editor, v21.2
running
on a Terminal window.
I entered "C-x 52" or "M-x make-frame", but it seems to react to the
command entry
but not produce a visible frame. So, I'm either entering the wrong
command(s) or the new
frame is exactly and completely overlapping the current frame.
So, if the command(s) are wrong, what would be right, or, if the new
frame completely overlaps
the current frame, is there a command, macro, or Lisp statement that
will "adjust" things?
Any information is appreciated. Thanks.
fjm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: make frame(s)
2007-08-26 17:17 make frame(s) trajan
@ 2007-08-26 18:04 ` Peter Dyballa
2007-08-26 22:44 ` Frank Murray
2007-08-26 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Dyballa @ 2007-08-26 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: trajan; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
Am 26.08.2007 um 19:17 schrieb trajan:
> I am trying to open a new frame within the Emacs editor, v21.2
> running
> on a Terminal window.
A frame is its own X client. When GNU Emacs is running inside some
terminal emulator, then it's not running as an X client. So can't
make it create new X clients.
Or do you mix up windows and frames?
--
Greetings
Pete
Who the fsck is "General Failure," and why is he reading my disk?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: make frame(s)
2007-08-26 17:17 make frame(s) trajan
2007-08-26 18:04 ` Peter Dyballa
@ 2007-08-26 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2007-08-26 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
> From: trajan <trajan3@mac.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:17:57 -0400
>
> I entered "C-x 52" or "M-x make-frame", but it seems to react to the
> command entry
> but not produce a visible frame.
Don't you see that the "F1" in the left corner of the mode line is
replaced with "F2"? That is the sign that Emacs _did_ create a new
frame, which overlaps the first one and shows the same buffer.
"C-x 5 b BUFFER-NAME" will show another buffer in th second frame.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: make frame(s)
2007-08-26 18:04 ` Peter Dyballa
@ 2007-08-26 22:44 ` Frank Murray
2007-08-27 8:52 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frank Murray @ 2007-08-26 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Dyballa; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
Perhaps I didn't explain myself properly. I meant to imply that
when you open
up a file (either new or an existing one), and you wish to open up a
new window
or "frame" (as I was under the impression that that is what Emacs
call windows)
for that file, you can enter either C-x 5 2 or M-x "make frame."
Let me know if this makes sense. Thanks.
fjm
On 26 Aug 2007, at 14:04 , Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> Am 26.08.2007 um 19:17 schrieb trajan:
>
>> I am trying to open a new frame within the Emacs editor, v21.2
>> running
>> on a Terminal window.
>
> A frame is its own X client. When GNU Emacs is running inside some
> terminal emulator, then it's not running as an X client. So can't
> make it create new X clients.
>
> Or do you mix up windows and frames?
>
> --
> Greetings
>
> Pete
>
> Who the fsck is "General Failure," and why is he reading my disk?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> help-gnu-emacs mailing list
>> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: make frame(s)
2007-08-26 22:44 ` Frank Murray
@ 2007-08-27 8:52 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Dyballa @ 2007-08-27 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Murray; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
Am 27.08.2007 um 00:44 schrieb Frank Murray:
> Perhaps I didn't explain myself properly. I meant to imply that
> when you open
> up a file (either new or an existing one), and you wish to open up
> a new window
> or "frame" (as I was under the impression that that is what Emacs
> call windows)
> for that file, you can enter either C-x 5 2 or M-x "make frame."
>
> Let me know if this makes sense. Thanks.
No. C-x 5 2 would create a new "window tool" – a "frame" in GNU Emacs
terminology – which can have a few windows or buffers/buffer views
open. What you want to use is C-x 2: split-window-vertically. Above
and below another separating mode-line you would see the same file
and buffer contents but would be able to scroll independently, i.e.
you would have two different views onto the same object.
--
Greetings
Pete
Sorry my terrible English, my native language Lisp!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-27 8:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-26 17:17 make frame(s) trajan
2007-08-26 18:04 ` Peter Dyballa
2007-08-26 22:44 ` Frank Murray
2007-08-27 8:52 ` Peter Dyballa
2007-08-26 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).