From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arthur Miller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does Richard M. Stallman still scrutinize and develop the codes of Emacs now? Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 19:49:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83sfzb9nx8.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnon9hvm.fsf@iki.fi> <87im06ri56.fsf@zoho.eu> <86sfz2e9mo.fsf@protonmail.com> <52bf3ee4-8e37-47ef-a28e-da8efc62f9a0@www.fastmail.com> <83zgt9wg9h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34157"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 19:49:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mHrbL-0008gB-4Q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 19:49:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49484 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHrbJ-0002wJ-Hj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 13:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHraz-0002vu-IP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 13:49:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oln040092066106.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.66.106]:29542 helo=EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHraw-0007sJ-D7; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 13:49:21 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VUtbKnutSjpEewnLdZSIa9PjsGEdBMHy8Ng7t4bRwqjJbLmaSG7UF3+i6zlhv3pqHkj94DtMwCyZylyQ1Edr6kKaWDvZPLU7M/k0TPtqT/OuByKnSaDry3lJXP/JQPu+5/fHXjdvPcAKzB8yEyAVkA+jE+DBRUCoWTZxx0vJ5CuoStrPL92slmrRr9KrO9jrWkuVUTJEkUg/cJe59DG5on/Zpca4aoZqy/NQX3Tjio9uBvdqMOUosRicwvSARU3dk+zu/tLBOnmcrz0zL5u+lDuIgFm+CAI2auv7ToEjnrDgyyEbVAo8J44QvvKgmdMhv1BGgFvchB5mlOlacPTdlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aNYCd/6z7v9RExHerY/IEGwuAR16utVQeEfh2m3WEzU=; b=O+DwnygzSSMYVH9YOmru8YXg+dkog0wp28RMn3KOboaTaNiZP2MecYKmuxAaPl4nkfIjar1f6dEQstUkGMFjmDZIHz9rUwtHdDbccJXsxi7HJEflixvIaqn/3hiC8+W3CMPF21gMG0NFhizQS5GommforxIyVwI8xgvlP6dFrefPNvYTbz4qJTFnGY+U8vi8Cy41ZI8iP6g4Spx3veIVV0/FODeVHdjGTMK/RcQSkevD/GQUd14UAvOrz0qgY7vNXogrikjoVdXy8tgLlDaldBTfTXs34NBFOGBKzeMJzMvdaIhG4xeupEtizxz/kQYcFEGaabOxzHFAqwFR7h/NbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aNYCd/6z7v9RExHerY/IEGwuAR16utVQeEfh2m3WEzU=; b=HzTckpDPanD008icsN5AGIF49p3ZgtTMdV8CrgDiptCFw3NG6p1zu72jEA3QfalkYtHFc9ZMBvHrBlZV0twg9oLQW58MUVXSlN9/+W0L/pgRxukXa4tNa5E/skACJRRNH9PB5HFe2hrf8vURcMBFHpbgAws+lxCGZYDbsmZgsKDJqYzxNu2BSQjdTrGnJYLihlIJWjguOLJLCuwAkUl3v4kEK9YfwYod2Wl06uDa2fATO/jOk2wr1GQR00fp0O+ZP6E6I0+zYn3K0OkdqPm1Rl5cdrq3COCwmtDD3SmTSs2eVabZ4v6aDzOjm34wV0lKIdoyG9Oz2Jkdt44eI+UJYA== Original-Received: from HE1EUR01FT048.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e18::44) by HE1EUR01HT175.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e18::125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4436.19; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 17:49:12 +0000 Original-Received: from AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e18::53) by HE1EUR01FT048.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e18::273) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4436.19 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 17:49:12 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:A54B358C67EDC0E378724293BA841AF526DCECA568F176725D5C48295EA2C409; UpperCasedChecksum:700BB73DC6988778FB66F8C63DFB747756A8A4D31F2FB1AE01F8DEB0E2C36B6C; SizeAsReceived:7860; Count:46 Original-Received: from AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b483:471e:6dc2:12ae]) by AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b483:471e:6dc2:12ae%9]) with mapi id 15.20.4436.024; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 17:49:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83zgt9wg9h.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:17:30 +0300") X-TMN: [ysqOf5wgAoP9VMZfv32EBvOgz8imxQcL] X-ClientProxiedBy: AS8PR05CA0024.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:311::29) To AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:304::20) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <875yvxmktk.fsf@live.com> X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Original-Received: from pascal.homepc (81.232.177.30) by AS8PR05CA0024.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:311::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4436.19 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 17:49:12 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 46 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: aa4a67e7-1e49-451a-6959-08d9659526a4 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: HE1EUR01HT175: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: B2bM0LRAjHnNtK9izmjEI+eUg1PQRS5ZIJb14Zbjn9Ca3r0YtYtwWQupIir9cPTZDp6cqkKAcCjaCBwHWB1BreMP2Uo9UmZjRiSdBKkQtSJ/l51ieUxqcbzZMAdZsqaWoU8RFAdUaUsGWX+QFH4ySmXvXQqG+KIrTPmwJrTs8AnwQBZaClk7eJPLrlMJ1RQ03JTntMc8X1G6J5PiC+9WU1joPfSpkc0OR2UMaFzs3JLnNaCz6eELYfMn8f8EFbIauceZIRQHzWMlAO6pfnzTgy2j8ci/RNPxgMln61qhq0RTo3EjccXMhAj8jAvFdp8ZAgXojp2L73yY6mYiv7ijuK6aQtL3QkNnjLA4hB+/oth6q+JJR7KtsAEfLkV5gIfLaasd3FkDq83+AI4LjS6mSWJ6ZVMGPwnuD2fNLuSafP7XYLFo4ZRaZo0JNWoWz02CyKT3zSGBnij4RozsM/Y0isrLnR0tPUxMnGU7ViCTHzs= X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: opSLB2ZXpH3aPP0hIZHfiBUVmqpc/z9yt0jikAhN6J8+ZRg122Bo8PWuzgUfufju1EEgB2aZs/57wdkwU/AObkRDCK+QvawBg+p2jadbl9eo11jLfhRNv3pekWQzhRUTAdpv826TZYWBm7rFmFuonA== X-OriginatorOrg: live.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: aa4a67e7-1e49-451a-6959-08d9659526a4 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2021 17:49:12.5553 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HE1EUR01FT048.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR01HT175 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=40.92.66.106; envelope-from=arthur.miller@live.com; helo=EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:132694 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 13:05:30 -0400 >> From: "Samuel Banya" >> >> The way I think of this is like this: >> >> There always will be a fork. > > I suggest to think again, and this time based on what history teaches > us. There _have_ been forks of Emacs, and we already know how they > ended. > > I guess forking Emacs is not the same as forking another project, even > if it's Vim. Remacs is officially dead: "This project isn't maintained anymore." https://github.com/remacs/remacs Emacs "Next Generation" is on the way ... :-).