From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitriy Igrishin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to choose the right emacs on Ubuntu Linux Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:58:21 +0300 Message-ID: References: <137428.79801.qm@web63005.mail.re1.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636284534f16de10494e306be X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289602865 3587 80.91.229.12 (12 Nov 2010 23:01:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Nerius Landys Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 13 00:01:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PH2a5-0001le-B7 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:01:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PH2Zu-0004wO-Mb for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:58:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37415 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PH2Zc-0004tb-A0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:58:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PH2Za-0002s1-Pw for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:35743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PH2Za-0002rv-NO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so190050qwh.0 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:58:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FVBu8mNzuaR03VXj+gIS+MB0czbgjtEoahyomXlyfCs=; b=XHhnruIvyLjNqxyyFXcQBxbl4WSYZN2DihJGIWeIEB9SWQRLkcy7NMI+6SKa4VnYDs 7qnXFZg++WIn0kC579sychOsfEvZ0usYAM0oRsJ1YpyKdgab8shutaJjuW5S/aVMeQ7B Si/k1bQvYewXqEnfwiolaNzoJQZH2X1cDGbQc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=uLLqHEJNmMpQl4H911YyUMWVCU/wXOAUzwkJmILD4A6XFR4hQWSGS9TqMYeKet63ws BKuE2GdQpHz149eLygu41fN0uW/lQ8pKzWzbRITxiHLvIvAPcMXLIvLLTMB4qp0HsoX4 e4Qh6UPQV13nAi/pQa4T0mWOst10xkFwKZYvw= Original-Received: by 10.229.219.73 with SMTP id ht9mr2534648qcb.190.1289602701814; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:58:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.229.184.70 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:58:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:75359 Archived-At: --001636284534f16de10494e306be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hey all, I use 23.2 compiled by myself. Works just fine. 2010/11/12 Nerius Landys > I use emacs23-nox. It runs in a terminal, but you get the antialiasing > from the terminal it's running in. > I actually find the full emacs GUI to be very annoying. > > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Maindoor wrote: > >> Hi, >> I've been using emacs-snapshot for a while for anti-aliasing support. >> But now since emacs itself supports anti-aliasing fonts, I'm now >> left with a dilemma, which one to use. >> So next I went to find proof of which is latest and bleeding edge. >> and saw the version. emacs-snapshot is of course the >> latest(23.1.50.1) >> but uses the old GTK+ (2.18.0) version. The emacs package >> version is older (23.1.1) but uses a newer GTK+ (2.20.0) version. >> Can someone provide the pros and cons of each and which >> one might be better to use ? >> >> Thanks. >> >> > -- // Dmitriy. --001636284534f16de10494e306be Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey all,

I use 23.2 compiled by myself. Works just fine.

2010/11/12 Nerius Landys <nlandys@gmail.com>
I use emacs23-nox.=C2=A0 It runs in a terminal, but you get the antialiasin= g from the terminal it's running in.
I actually find the full emacs = GUI to be very annoying.


--
// Dmitriy.=


--001636284534f16de10494e306be--