From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gnuist007@hotmail.com (gnuist) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Lambda calculus and it relation to LISP Date: 4 Oct 2002 20:20:49 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <9e8ebeb2.0210041920.2e480123@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033788444 2634 127.0.0.1 (5 Oct 2002 03:27:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 03:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17xfb7-0000gH-00 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 05:27:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xfa3-0006Jh-00; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 23:26:15 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help,comp.lang.lisp,sci.math,sci.logic Original-Lines: 26 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.179.42.77 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1033788049 22873 127.0.0.1 (5 Oct 2002 03:20:49 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Oct 2002 03:20:49 GMT Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:105736 comp.lang.lisp:95595 sci.math:549491 sci.logic:61507 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:2281 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:2281 I read the following quote in a book on emacs and similar things in a book on lisp. "The lambda calculus is a mathematical formalism having to do with the way functions instantiate their arguments. To some extent it is the theoretical basis for Lisp and plenty of other computer languages." I am interested in a little concrete elaboration of this statement by any mathematicians, logicians or practitioners/users of lisp and lisp in emacs. This is an interdisciplinary topic and cross-posted. Please beware of this and be undaunted in intellectual work just in case some rude individual jumps in and threatens the discussion on this thread. This comment is in view of a sad incident by a similar character on a valid interdisciplinary thread on comp.lang.lisp and gnu.emacs.help. Previously this individual had also posted unbecoming comments to Professor Fateman of UC Berkeley who is actually a very nice and helpful individual in my experience about two years ago from a phone conversation with me. I think that it would be exciting and intellectually satisfying to know an answer to this question for many of us in the math/logic/lisp/emacs community.