From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does anyone really use emacs in terminal? Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 07:42:31 +0200 Organization: Informatimago Message-ID: <87zjwaugmw.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> References: <20130505041339.GA5537@hysteria.proulx.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367732723 15691 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2013 05:45:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 05:45:23 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 05 07:45:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UYrlA-0005QB-Py for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 07:45:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYrlA-0005LU-FO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 01:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYrky-0005KD-Pl for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 01:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYrkt-0001SE-KW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 01:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYrkt-0001QN-DG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 01:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UYrks-0005FE-QE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 07:45:02 +0200 Original-Received: from amontsouris-651-1-14-160.w90-46.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.46.105.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 May 2013 07:45:02 +0200 Original-Received: from pjb by amontsouris-651-1-14-160.w90-46.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 May 2013 07:45:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: amontsouris-651-1-14-160.w90-46.abo.wanadoo.fr Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Accept-Language: fr, es, en User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NzJhYjhhM2EwNzAwODlkOGNjMmRlYmY1NmJmY2RhNGJkNDBjNDJjMA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:90508 Archived-At: Steven Degutis writes: > Any time I find myself editing files on a remote server, it's because > I stupidly didn't prepare for the task properly and have to fix > something "live". This is never a planned situation, and one I should > really be avoiding rather than catering to. And in those rare times > that I still find myself editing remote files, the server usually only > has vim anyway, which gets the job done. No, not on my servers. They never had vi or vim installed. Not since 1986. Even before booting the first installation of a system, emacs is installed on. Otherwise how can you configure it? -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.