From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Colin_Baxter_=F0=9F=98=BA?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: emojis not colored Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:37:48 +0000 Message-ID: <87zgq5w9hf.fsf@yandex.com> References: <87ilwuepz1.fsf@yandex.com> <831r3ivjxm.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee7iel4v.fsf@yandex.com> <87a6i6eh07.fsf@yandex.com> <83fsrytvpa.fsf@gnu.org> <875ysuedqf.fsf@yandex.com> <83bl2mttsa.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgq6cy53.fsf@yandex.com> <874k8ddcfq.fsf@gmail.com> <87y25pojd4.fsf@yandex.com> <87pmr1o8t6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1903"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 15 19:39:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mmgtO-0000KF-1K for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:39:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42532 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmgtM-0005S8-PQ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:39:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmgrg-0005Rz-0G for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:38:00 -0500 Original-Received: from forward500o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.195]:41562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmgrc-0005IB-Sw for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:37:59 -0500 Original-Received: from iva4-25ea1f41b2ae.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva4-25ea1f41b2ae.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0c:89f:0:640:25ea:1f41]) by forward500o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2B761941736; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:37:51 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from iva1-dcde80888020.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva1-dcde80888020.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0c:7695:0:640:dcde:8088]) by iva4-25ea1f41b2ae.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id Cnqs9DEOYG-boCKawnp; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:37:51 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1637001471; bh=2SPiwe5HEf07nnVVB1j6mPZO8FGHRWU7xYy+OLlQ7fE=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:References:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc; b=UCF1tzwitY+M2z3XmZYfGaH6Phedsyu5Io7XS5z71mFog7IMk3DWZIlHdHvGp3/HT /WW88cJQuofXsTzDpw/yNPMXF8ZE+N6/qQ10zZyebD1d/viSXZqAIuH+20ynhPFq7l c7FukdQK5xBWvkrR4tO9PYB9l6nHOhG6qHu0puMs= Authentication-Results: iva4-25ea1f41b2ae.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Original-Received: by iva1-dcde80888020.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id zh1hIPCyfj-boL4B9Gg; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:37:50 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Fwd: 2 X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T X-Message-My-Extra-Message: 8-) We are the only ones here =?utf-8?B?8J+YuiDwn5i6IPCfmLo=?= In-Reply-To: <87pmr1o8t6.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:19:33 +0100") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAEkAAAATAgMAAAChCMjeAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAACVBMVEX/zAABCWP///8I RHjYAAAAAWJLR0QCZgt8ZAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB+UFEAk5BvqS634A AAAbSURBVBjTY2BgCA1hYA0FAxDDgQEERsXoIAYA2F9Eb3cpB+AAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRl ADIwMjEtMDUtMTZUMTA6NTY6MTcrMDE6MDCh/kkpAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA1 LTE2VDA5OjU3OjA2KzAxOjAwTyZ6HwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.140.190.195; envelope-from=m43cap@yandex.com; helo=forward500o.mail.yandex.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:134614 Archived-At: >>>>> Robert Pluim writes: >>>>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:31:35 +0000, Colin Baxter =F0=9F=98=BA said: Colin> I had sort of given up on NotoColorEmji.tff after seeing the Colin> fontlint output. Now, however, if fontlint gives the same Colin> output on a working font then I'll have to re-think. Colin> Thanks for the information. > If you want to debug this further, etc/PROBLEMS has the following: > *** This may be due to your local fontconfig customization. > Try removing or moving aside "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/conf.d" > and "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf" ($XDG_CONFIG_HOME is > treated as "~/.config" if not set) > Running Emacs as > FC_DEBUG=3D1024 emacs > will cause fontconfig to output information about which > configuration files it is reading. Running Emacs as > FC_DEBUG=3D1 emacs > will result in information about the results of fontconfig's > font matching (including the filename(s) of the resulting fonts). > Robert -- Thanks. This confirms what I thought. My NotoColorEmji.tff which is located in ~/.fonts is not being used. I have tried various fontconfig recipes in my ~/.config/fontconfig/conf.d. None of them help - I'm not surprised since they were largely guesses. I'm running Debian 9.13 and I read somewhere on the Internet that this is too old for google emoji color fonts. I don't know if that's correct or not. If it is then I'll probably stick with emacs-emojify (which I quite like) until I upgrade my machine. Thank you very much for your kind help. Best wishes, Colin Baxter.