From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>, Rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com>,
help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Do we want more choice? (was Bookmark the end of file?)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:53:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4lwea78.fsf@mbork.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150413071741.GA22660@tuxteam.de>
On 2015-04-13, at 09:17, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> "A general realization." "Nowadays." Ooooh. Can't argue with that.
>>
>> Consideration of one particular choice has now been successfully
>> diverted toward vacuous generalizations about choice in general -
>> platitudes of Polonius. Too bad.
>
> I must say that I agree strongly with this point of view.
>
> More choice is *always* better. The hard part is presenting this
> choice to the user in a way it doesn't overwhelm her/him.
Hm. Don't want to sound trollish, but as a mathematician I'm strongly
against using the general quantifier where it doesn't belong. So, not
*always*, but often. (A good source of counterexamples is ethics.
I wouldn't consider giving my child -- or myself, for that matter --
giving more choice wrt to e.g. drugs a good thing.)
> I have the strong suspicion that the "less choice is good" movement
> we are seeing stems from being too lazy (or at a loss) wrt thinking
> hard about how to guide the user through a rich set of choices. The
> latter would be, in my view, the right thing to do.
+1.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-13 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 23:39 Bookmark the end of file? Marcin Borkowski
2015-04-06 23:59 ` Drew Adams
2015-04-07 1:03 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-04-07 0:00 ` Dale Snell
2015-04-07 1:10 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-04-07 13:36 ` J. David Boyd
2015-04-07 19:11 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-04-07 16:49 ` Dale Snell
2015-04-07 19:19 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-04-07 21:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-07 22:27 ` Drew Adams
2015-04-12 20:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-12 20:42 ` Drew Adams
2015-04-12 21:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-12 21:34 ` Drew Adams
2015-04-13 2:23 ` Stefan Monnier
[not found] ` <mailman.528.1428874505.904.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2015-04-13 3:28 ` Do we want more choice? (was Bookmark the end of file?) Rusi
2015-04-13 5:35 ` Drew Adams
2015-04-13 7:17 ` tomas
2015-04-13 7:53 ` Marcin Borkowski [this message]
2015-04-13 8:12 ` tomas
2015-04-13 14:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-13 19:23 ` tomas
2015-04-14 7:38 ` Gian Uberto Lauri
2015-04-14 14:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-14 14:42 ` Gian Uberto Lauri
2015-04-14 15:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-14 15:37 ` Gian Uberto Lauri
2015-04-13 17:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-13 19:26 ` tomas
2015-04-13 7:36 ` Marcin Borkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y4lwea78.fsf@mbork.pl \
--to=mbork@mbork.pl \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=rustompmody@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).