From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: My read-buffer-function doesn't work when called by switch-to-buffer Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 01:32:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87y1o486wo.fsf@web.de> References: <875yb8nvvk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8481"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:YytXJC5SJ5VXh2L1tb+Y7Xqe8+k= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 01:32:55 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1panAN-0001z0-5k for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 01:32:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pan9o-0004Tj-Oy; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 19:32:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pan9m-0004Oz-Oh for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 19:32:18 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pan9l-00077T-8p for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 19:32:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pan9j-00014Y-7n for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 01:32:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142974 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: > (defun th/read-buffer-or-recentf (prompt &optional > def require-match predicate) > (when-let ((result (completing-read > prompt > (completion-table-in-turn #'internal-complete-buffer > (completion-table-dynamic > (lambda (s) recentf-list))) > predicate require-match nil 'buffer-name-history def))) > (cond > ((get-buffer result) result) > ((file-exists-p result) (buffer-name (find-file-noselect result))) > (t result)))) > > (setq read-buffer-function #'th/read-buffer-or-recentf) > [...] > However, when I do C-x b (switch-to-buffer), no matter what, recent > files are not provided as completion candidates. But edebug convinces > me that my function th/read-buffer-or-recentf is called. It just seems > that the same completing-read call behaves differently when called > directly and when being called by switch-to-buffer. Why is that and > what can I do against it? Seems this happens because `read-buffer-to-switch' sets `minibuffer-completion-table'. Michael.