From: "A. L. Meyers" <nospam.look@replyto.because.this.is.invalid>
Subject: Re: emacs or xemacs?
Date: 14 Sep 2002 10:33:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wuppezs3.fsf@nomad.consult-meyers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.1031732603.1996.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Although it may not be perfect, the xemacs package system works
reasonably well and is certainly better than no package system at all,
alas still the case with emacs AFAIK.
My personal hope is that the developers of both emacsen with soon get
over the unicode hump and with unicode as the base get all the other
encodings to work transparently in the background. A stupid, lazy end
user's dream. :-)
Lucien
--
If you receive this by error, please delete it and inform the sender.
PGP Key fingerprint=F1C0 D9AE 1B18 1405 4DFA B4CC 6DC7 FF78 C76E FB15
To Big Brother Echelon from "spook":
Ortega cracking anthrax North Korea World Trade Center colonel NORAD FBI
next parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-14 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1031732603.1996.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-14 8:33 ` A. L. Meyers [this message]
2005-05-22 21:14 Emacs or XEmacs? JS
2005-05-22 21:28 ` David Kastrup
2005-05-22 23:30 ` Tim Johnson
2005-05-23 5:23 ` It's me FKtPp ;)
2005-05-23 16:09 ` Drew Adams
2005-05-23 18:23 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] <mailman.1031674809.15931.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-10 17:34 ` emacs or xemacs? Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 18:57 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:04 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-09-10 20:40 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 19:05 ` Stefan Monnier <foo@acm.com>
2002-09-11 7:51 ` Adam
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:34 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-11 10:35 ` Sacha Chua
2002-09-11 22:25 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 8:29 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-12 9:14 ` Zhongtao Zhu
2002-09-12 14:23 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 19:33 ` maierh
2002-09-12 15:51 ` D. Goel
2002-09-11 21:36 ` Rodney Sparapani
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-10 16:18 Aurelio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wuppezs3.fsf@nomad.consult-meyers.com \
--to=nospam.look@replyto.because.this.is.invalid \
--cc=a.l.meyers@consult-meyers.comh \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).