From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Pittman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: emacs for everything? Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:16:51 +1100 Message-ID: <87wtw6evbw.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> References: <87pt2ej98v.fsf@node1.ddorf.de> <87zn1g2t5j.fld@barrow.com> <876540gxzw.fld@barrow.com> <86brdqp4au.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> <87mzx8bao8.fsf@lizard.king> <86hdnef42h.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> <87mzx6q8ud.fsf@lizard.king> <867jo9nfsc.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> <871xeftdvj.fsf@lizard.king> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101600178 10046 80.91.229.6 (28 Nov 2004 00:02:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 28 01:02:53 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYCWj-00048T-00 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:02:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYCg3-0003oU-04 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:12:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYCfg-0003oK-Ph for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYCff-0003o4-NS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYCff-0003no-6y for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CYCVz-0004iW-AC for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYCVy-0004O2-00 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:02:06 +0100 Original-Received: from 203-217-29-45.perm.iinet.net.au ([203.217.29.45]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:02:06 +0100 Original-Received: from daniel by 203-217-29-45.perm.iinet.net.au with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:02:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203-217-29-45.perm.iinet.net.au User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:O4uS8henW7J8Gg6ktspPyMPirmM= X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:22384 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:22384 On 28 Nov 2004, Maciek Pasternacki wrote: > On Sweetmorn, The Aftermath 39, 3170 YOLD, Kai Grossjohann wrote: > >>>>> Also, I don't like screen(1) eating my C-a which I use frequently to >>>>> jump to beginning of line in shell. After thinking about other >>>>> binding to use, I realised that I use virtually every binding (since >>>>> I learned Emacs I use the same bindings in shell). >>>> >>>> I use ` for screen, `` inserts a single ` character. Works quite well. >>> >>> ...except when you try to paste a shell script from >>> editor/browser/whatever. Before I had ScreenTerm and could safely >>> disable hotkey I also used backtick but strange things happening when >>> pasting textwere annoying. >> >> Yeah. A friend uses C-o, perhaps that's better. In a shell, you >> don't use C-o that often, and for the few times, C-o o is good enough, >> I think. To duck in here briefly, after *long* consideration, I ended up with my screen(1) control key on 'C-]', with 'C-] C-]' generating the actual sequence. The logic: I don't use `abort-recursive-edit' very often at all, and the only other common tool using that key sequence at all is telnet(1). Daniel -- Men become civilized, not in proportion to their willingness to believe, but in proportion to their readiness to doubt. -- H. L. Mencken