From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 01:19:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87woiqoulh.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <83v9yb92c7.fsf@gnu.org> <878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net> <83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus> <83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <20190516224611.wr32phaq6mxkxylv@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="262131"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 01:20:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPfv-00162q-67 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:20:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38197 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPft-0000Ke-VY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:20:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPfX-0000J8-F9 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPfU-0002sI-QR for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=58120 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPfS-0002qY-TY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPfN-0015Tv-5F for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:20:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:H6l32syafZtgEZTpQSXxaBAGQzQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120449 Archived-At: Ergus writes: >>anyway, who cares about a few dozen MB of difference when some of the >>modern contenders use GB of *RAM* to work? >> > > There is actually a thread complaining about the emacs size in windows I was one of the complainers. The problem was that the zip file contained debug info and a duplicated large executable, it had nothing to do with the topic of this thread.