From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: GNU Hacker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: lexical-let void function Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 01:08:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87wngg45qe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o81s8f8q.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsn4wab8.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8562"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 01:08:56 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nYGSj-00020m-Ib for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2022 01:08:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55526 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nYGSh-0004Vn-VN for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:08:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nYGSM-0004VR-2C for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mta763.solicitae.com ([89.35.150.78]:42364 helo=smtp.gnuhacker.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nYGSK-00045e-5s for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:08:29 -0400 Original-Received: from hackerlab.gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnuhacker.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AEC600C5F for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2022 01:08:25 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87fsn4wab8.fsf@telefonica.net> (=?utf-8?Q?=22=C3=93scar?= Fuentes"'s message of "Sun, 27 Mar 2022 00:42:03 +0100") Received-SPF: none client-ip=89.35.150.78; envelope-from=project@gnuhacker.org; helo=smtp.gnuhacker.org X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.187, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:136781 Archived-At: =C3=93scar Fuentes writes: > GNU Hacker writes: >> I find `lexical-let' func in a old emacs script, but it is a void >> function in my emacs version 28.0.92 >> maybe require it any emacs package? > (require 'cl) > Emacs now provides "native" lexical binding. See the "Lexical binding" > node in the Elisp manual. Package cl is deprecated in emacs 28.0.92 I fixed it adding -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- to the first line Just do M-x elisp-enable-lexical-binding --=20 Emacs Lover. FSF Member. Free/Libre Software supporter. stallmansupport.org - Disinformation succeeds because so many people care deeply about injustice but do not take the time to check the facts.