Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:

> Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:
>
>> So what is this eval'd to - an why?
>
> The answer to the question in the subject is easier: No!
>
>
>> Hint: All and any method is allowed!
>>
>> ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
>>
>> (require 'cl-lib)
>>
>> (cl-loop
>>   for i from 0 to 1
>>   collect (lambda () i) into funs
>>   finally return (apply #'+ (mapcar #'funcall funs)) )

Somehow, the code doesn't make any sense to me.  What it's supposed to
achieve?

>
> Any method?  I would like to test it with Emacs 31.  Would it make a

Where did you get "Emacs 31"?  ;)

> difference?
>
> Honestly: Do the cl-loop fans think we should change the behavior?
>
>
> Michael.
>
>

-- 
Akib Azmain Turja, GPG key: 70018CE5819F17A3BBA666AFE74F0EFA922AE7F5
Fediverse: akib@hostux.social
Codeberg: akib
emailselfdefense.fsf.org | "Nothing can be secure without encryption."