Re: Run shell command from latex?

[jadamson@partners.org (Joel J. Adamson)]

Nikolaj Schumacher <n_schumacher@web.de> writes:

> jadamson@partners.org (Joel J. Adamson) wrote:
>
>> David Hansen <david.hansen@gmx.net> writes:
>>
>> As for not wanting to type "make" every time, (1) you don't: the default
>> compile-command comes up in the minibuffer and you hit RET; and
>
> Ever better, bind `recompile' to a key, and you won't have to hit RET at
> all.
>
>> (2) get
>> real: yes you can skip that extra keystroke but do you want to deal with
>> the crap you're going to get from skipping it?  What happens if you
>> change your mind about which command to run?
>
> What should happen?  Unless you're using `compile' for "rm -rf ~/", it
> doesn't strike me as the kind of command that requires you to think
> twice about using it.

If instead of using a makefile, I've just written one piece of code and
I still want to use compilation-mode, I just want to compile it with say

gcc -o blah blah.c

then I wouldn't use the command "make," obviously.  My point was that if
OP is in that sort of situation, and he uses "make" then he will be
disappointed with the results.  I *would* rather think about it.

Joel

-- 
Joel J. Adamson
Biostatistician
Pediatric Psychopharmacology Research Unit
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, MA  02114
(617) 643-1432
(303) 880-3109
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu

The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only
for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this
information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and
properly dispose of this information.