From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: efficiently viewing Unix timestamps as dates Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:48:21 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87vcy7pbze.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87mxo9mvxm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp4la59u.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwtx5n3c.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjtk73tb.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hav4fj9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r58ygyse.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r58yf6zg.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306267712 11854 80.91.229.12 (24 May 2011 20:08:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:08:32 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 22:08:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QOxu0-00060G-7H for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:08:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49644 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOxtz-0001Iy-Kx for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:08:27 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news-transit.tcx.org.uk!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Trace: news.albasani.net YGkGDMBsA0YUpLji6MI1wXSc2Yls8dB8L/XgRNo8ibmfhs/qW/066gVtIrgOWeDZBxAo3Zo0svB24/Dax8SGiQ== Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="uguZpAjYXvOOOXTkqUpgH/HMjxZBY2fol93p1UkgPtAESwCtvNt1TksQjWXtFHdHr/OVLx9IHPvUns7bW9NTGxizFBaB+EVanYHAjPeYQfmLQVkGV3hvLwbDOZ5Bm/Ei"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Cancel-Lock: sha1:dwUe48VBEQKjiWg8C+S5U9u8+Gk= sha1:M40MgokE2A73ajbsq3TGZojcleA= Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:186704 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:81051 Archived-At: On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:20:58 -0300 Stefan Monnier wrote: SM> The issue is to not remove the display property placed on *other* SM> chunks of text. >> The package only applies the display property to text it matches. SM> Yes, but you do want to remove that property at some point. Why remove it? Do you mean when the package is turned off, or at some point in the redisplay process? SM> Using font-lock-extra-managed-props is asking font-lock to take complete SM> control of the property (i.e. it causes font-lock-fontify-region to SM> start by erasing the `display' property over the whole fontified region) SM> so if the display property is set by a package that doesn't use SM> font-lock, that will be lost. Hmm, does Emacs need a `font-lock-display' property, to be used iff `display' is not specified? This seems like a lot of pain that should not be passed to the package authors but handled in the core. Are there packages that set `display' without letting font-lock manage it? I want to test the code you suggested against something that actually breaks with epoch-view.el. My previous question remains: is this serious enough that epoch-view.el should not go in the GNU ELPA until it's fixed, or is it a minor bug I can work on later? Ted