From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Reverting but keeping undo Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:05:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc606s4a.fsf@web.de> References: <87mwrwede7.fsf@wanadoo.es> <878v2w8g3t.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369951553 14165 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2013 22:05:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 31 00:05:53 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UiAym-0007F2-9B for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:05:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51053 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiAyl-0004Wx-Qi for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiAyV-0004WU-De for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:05:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiAyU-0006h5-5h for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:57334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiAyT-0006h1-Sk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.130.200]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOzsZ-1UkfHh2f6F-006RpE; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:05:31 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 30 May 2013 17:26:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:jX/Pe346EgBBFy203nw5j5Bf49QFjLzN/Ds0CdjM3Fu tWxG+D4oBiPRcALNj0Oxr5V44gzhXy2QJSeNVezNk2I7csIGG1 1ZjnuHv2Cvv1blgZftr5fQ+89g/+XMPyZ5i9q9KgEEEwbNFIGt VW6F7kF9ET+JPHV0QVCAvx7PufKrQWQrlulbieXSzi2IazH0T4 gL+gR3KVWWxylGfWU1foJEhq40Tpi23jOIXsInBiRo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.14 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:91184 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > I wonder how that works. > > The revert is considered as a change like any other. I.e. the first > undo step simply undoes the buffer modifications introduced by the > revert. That sounds good, thanks. I wonder, however, if the user will notice when he passes that point while successively undoing. I.e., for the case the user doesn't want to undo prior reverts, maybe there could be some kind of warning in the minibuffer. Regards, Michael.