From: Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Procedure (closure) using a macro fails to work after byte-compilation
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 22:24:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vazgwr0o.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am trying to simulate proper tail recursion in emacs, so I write a
custom macro that does the same as `letrec'. Following this textbook
implementation in Scheme:
(define-syntax letrec
(syntax-rules ()
((_ ((var init) ...) . body)
(let ((var 'undefined) ...)
(let ((var (let ((temp init)) (lambda () (set! var temp))))
...
(bod (lambda () . body)))
(var) ... (bod))))))
I wrote:
;; Note that we have to `(setq lexical-binding t)' before doing
;; anything. Also, the macro is a simplified version of the real one.
(defmacro letrec2 (bindings form &rest forms)
(declare (indent defun))
(let* ((uninit-bindings ; Produce s-exp to produce uninitialized bindings.
(cl-mapcar (lambda (binding)
(pcase-let ((`(,name ,_) binding))
`(,name (cl-gensym))))
bindings))
;; Produce s-exp to produce thunks for doing assignment.
(assign-thunks
(cl-mapcar (lambda (binding)
(pcase-let ((temp (cl-gensym))
(`(,var ,init) binding))
`(,var
(let ((,temp ,init))
(lambda ()
(setq ,var ,temp))))))
bindings))
(eval-thunks ; Produce s-exp to evaluate thunks.
(cl-mapcar (lambda (binding)
(pcase-let ((`(,name ,_) binding))
`(funcall ,name)))
bindings))
(body (cl-gensym)))
`(let ,uninit-bindings
(let (,@assign-thunks (,body (lambda ()
,form
,@forms)))
,@eval-thunks
(funcall ,body)))))
Now the problem is that the macro works normally, but fails to work
after byte-compilation.
For example:
(funcall (lambda ()
(letrec2 ((sumtorial (lambda (n a)
(if (zerop n)
a
(funcall sumtorial (- n 1)
(+ n a))))))
(funcall sumtorial 100 0))))
=> 5050
But:
(funcall
(byte-compile
'(lambda ()
(letrec2 ((sumtorial (lambda (n a)
(if (zerop n)
a
(funcall sumtorial (- n 1)
(+ n a))))))
(funcall sumtorial 100 0)))))
gives the message "Symbol's function definition is void: nil".
Is this a bug, or a limitation I am unaware of?
Cheers,
Alex
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 14:24 Alex Vong [this message]
2016-08-06 23:32 ` Procedure (closure) using a macro fails to work after byte-compilation Michael Heerdegen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vazgwr0o.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=alexvong1995@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).