From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Felix Natter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Gnus: #62345: Composing mail from secondary frame does not generate Gcc: header Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 17:27:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87v8i7g1bu.fsf@bitburger.home.felix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6067"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:9hYM0YBXc/C/a49Vmz4lJAVujJk= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 07 17:27:54 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pko0I-0001KV-3k for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 17:27:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pknzo-0004Hx-3C; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 11:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pknzm-0004Fz-Bi for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 11:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pknzk-0007Zm-EE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 11:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pknzf-0000Wk-9N for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 17:27:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:143220 Archived-At: hello Emacs experts, Gnus/Emacs (27.1) behaves differently when composing mail from a secondary frame: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62345 I have a workaround (don't use a secondary frame in Gnus), but for new users / users unaware of the issue this can be very confusing because the mails aren't archived and thus you assume the mail was not sent at all. Could someone consider taking a look? Maybe this is even fixed in later Emacs, I am using Debian11 Emacs (27.1). Many Thanks and Best Regards, Felix -- Felix Natter