From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Ido for saving files or similar? Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:19:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87tyu93yhi.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264504922 14867 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2010 11:22:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:22:02 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 26 12:21:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NZjUY-0001lN-KN for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:21:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36891 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZjUZ-0006vp-Bl for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:21:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZjSK-0005tO-Jn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZjSF-0005oK-OJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38668 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZjSF-0005nw-E8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:48864) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZjSF-0002a0-1c for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NZjSA-0000xY-6d for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:19:26 +0100 Original-Received: from wlan-150.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.93.150]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:19:26 +0100 Original-Received: from tassilo by wlan-150.uni-koblenz.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:19:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 41 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wlan-150.uni-koblenz.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ykWzlDYW0hMIQXysPefRGfHJHmk= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:71474 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: Hi Stefan, >> Hey, that's nice. `minibuffer-force-complete' should be bound in >> `minibuffer-local-completion-map', right? > > Yes. I personally bind it to M-TAB. That's what I did. Copyist! ;-) >> Is it normal, that icomplete doesn't show completions for files? >> Here, it works for the `describe-function', `describe-variable', and >> for buffer switching, but for not for `find-file' and friends. > > Kind of. Please report it as a bug. I'll do. > In the mean time, you can add read-file-name-internal to > icomplete-with-completion-tables. Works perfect. ,----[ C-h v icomplete-with-completion-tables RET ] | icomplete-with-completion-tables is a variable defined in `icomplete.el'. | Its value is | (read-file-name-internal internal-complete-buffer) | | Documentation: | Specialized completion tables with which icomplete should operate. | | Icomplete does not operate with any specialized completion tables | except those on this list. `---- But why does it complete functions and variables, too? The last paragraph seems to contradict this behavior. Bye, Tassilo