From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Revert Emacs to version supporting cedet backticks? Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:31:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87tyi7w0i2.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: <877hf3og6k.fsf@notengoamigos.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292949168 11598 80.91.229.12 (21 Dec 2010 16:32:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:32:48 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 21 17:32:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PV58l-0007VH-2D for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:32:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34068 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PV58k-0002Gf-Jd for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:32:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59440 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PV58D-0002GD-Oo for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:32:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PV586-0006kN-5w for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:42930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PV585-0006jy-TP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PV584-00078J-AZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:32:00 +0100 Original-Received: from tsdh.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.67.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:32:00 +0100 Original-Received: from tassilo by tsdh.uni-koblenz.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:32:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tsdh.uni-koblenz.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6SC8KemtCqSmNzR1NvgCL0HYHWc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:77741 Archived-At: Jason Earl writes: Hi Jason, >> I see that the Emacs trunk won't allow the old backticks to compile >> anymore, does anyone know what tag I could revert to so I can use >> cedet? I promise I won't write any elisp with backticks from now on. >> :) > > bzr Emacs actually includes a fairly new version of CEDET. Does the > upstream version of CEDET use backticks? I don't think backticks are a problem, but only the old-style stuff deprecated for more than a decade had a bug in the current emacs bzr HEAD. `(foo ,tab-width) ;; new style. ok! ==> (foo 2) (` (foo (, tab-width))) ;; old style. had a bug, but works for me... ==> (foo 2) I use a very recent Emacs version, so it seems that the bug is already fixed. But it's still a very good idea to replace the old-style backquotes/backticks. Bye, Tassilo