From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Essential question [re: Re: "Text is read-only"... except it isn't... or shouldn't be] Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:48:33 +0400 Message-ID: <87txm3kmke.fsf@yandex.ru> References: <5190B6C2.3060801@mousecar.com> <83y5bi97sp.fsf@gnu.org> <51911A2B.6070100@mousecar.com> <83r4ha959c.fsf@gnu.org> <5191A2BA.7080108@mousecar.com> <83bo8e83ef.fsf@gnu.org> <6DBF2725-3120-4A0D-A23B-C1C16CA8AF22@Web.DE> <51922C68.1030700@mousecar.com> <8338tp8yuu.fsf@gnu.org> <5192A11F.1080003@mousecar.com> <51937603.1050304@mousecar.com> <5194BE49.4070105@mousecar.com> <5194EBC8.8080402@mousecar.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368715749 1659 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2013 14:49:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Kevin Rodgers To: ken Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 16 16:49:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UczUR-0001ho-2z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 16:49:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53425 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UczUQ-0003jC-EW for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37433) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UczU3-0003hx-9X for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UczTv-0004gR-C6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]:49962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UczTv-0004ez-55 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id v10so3173710lbd.6 for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 07:48:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-antivirus :x-antivirus-status; bh=klEATDj9zq3oXflMvF7eOqSe79KydaNSkN1lrFscp4I=; b=R170Z2r4VNop2DS7V3UlP9T8asQFqaWr/CiE/vm0B06UBNsysGaSy/GB4EUDRZXWIm oFSJDDcjHUG/Yo0tmWkb7v7pOW+d9rXhUoj7D26JZXcBAVvwaowQTaxjs86gajMf1Kko d0Ur+9CHYrbPpHM2Nyf4oqucS7TW6LqEu5F0iw6wsuIbxbKr4WEFRF500gPM+V0wzQH3 wRI22qTi8Yq0FhbvuF1NUF3vfpRtPezwJquu3QE7ky97OFbb13/PXzGk348vSfTovqcH +MvI2DCGpvYT/AyZYT68VGS/mk/n9UxnbCdeuNeI2/7RyBRKENBLOHZW8R0I9KqYsiSG 73qA== X-Received: by 10.112.89.104 with SMTP id bn8mr20397653lbb.92.1368715714082; Thu, 16 May 2013 07:48:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from SOL ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kz1sm2848648lab.6.2013.05.16.07.48.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 May 2013 07:48:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5194EBC8.8080402@mousecar.com> (ken's message of "Thu, 16 May 2013 10:23:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130516-0, 16.05.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.175 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:90846 Archived-At: ken writes: > If this question can't be answered straightforwardly and > unambiguously, then there's really no sense in discussing code... or > filing a bug report. For how could it be determined whether the code > is working or not? The code is working as intended. If you disagree with its behavior, you should file a bug report like someone already suggested. The bug tracker is not only used for glaring bugs, for also for feature requests, etc.