From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Including tex commands in a list Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:00:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87tuqzsv0l.fsf@web.de> References: <87k0ryf0ho.fsf@web.de> <87lfcdnnr3.fsf@web.de> <87k0rwvjwl.fsf@web.de> <87zh0srlry.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:+H2gWC8/k4iizNNkiEgXdNV815c= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 29 15:01:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l5ULD-00089D-8s for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:01:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5ULC-0008TZ-9Q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37992) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UKB-0008I2-ON for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:00:35 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:55028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UK9-00075G-Re for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:00:35 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UK7-0007B7-EF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:00:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:127425 Archived-At: steve-humphreys@gmx.com writes: > Should I still try to use "rx" for my situation? I would do it, it makes the regexp better readable. That's why I mentioned it. Of course it takes a bit of extra time to learn the syntax. It's totally ok to go without `rx'. Regards, Michael.