From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Setting numecir values according to symbol Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:01:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87sfj54g8w.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3956"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:tXIZY11MlFcLQgGffOIvJiZx818= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 30 16:49:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1opAZJ-0000qD-06 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 16:49:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opAZA-00068o-V1; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 11:49:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1op89c-0000Wh-6r for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1op89a-0006eV-FA for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1op89W-0008Px-2k for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:15:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 11:49:39 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:140518 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor wrote: >> (defvar mbcomplt 0) >> >> (cond >> ((eq armg 'auto) (setq mbcomplt 0) >> ((eq armg 'icomplt-horz) (setq mbcomplt 1) >> ((eq armg 'icomplt-vert) (setq mbcomplt 2) >> ((eq armg 'ivy) (setq mbcomplt 3) >> ((eq armg 'vertico) (setq mbcomplt 4) >> ((eq armg 'helm) (setq mbcomplt 5))) > > Without giving more info about how you're using those two > vars, it's hard to tell, but my crystal ball tells that > you're probably better off getting rid of `mbcomplt` and > using `armg` instead. Because one variable shouldn't be functionally dependent on another ... -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal