From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:46:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87sfewek2d.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87bklw7ka3.fsf@dataswamp.org> <878rgyjgcc.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87o7pq21i4.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87ilfy20jf.fsf@dataswamp.org> <83pma6yahj.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsb21z1n.fsf@dataswamp.org> <83ilfyxiw6.fsf@gnu.org> <83k00btcsl.fsf@gnu.org> <871qmj7z9e.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87k00abqxs.fsf_-_@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31214"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:EbRmiYtmcpSi8WKpjqF0S6S2x60= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 19:12:04 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pVG4a-0007oj-RT for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 19:12:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVG41-0000DC-Tv; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 13:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pV97B-0004LV-Ou for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 05:46:17 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pV975-0001JJ-Pc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 05:46:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pV974-0002B5-3H for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:46:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 13:11:24 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142822 Archived-At: Anyway these stats speak their own language - again 78 875 % - and that also means there should be no reason why the Jenovah Project can't be re-initiated based on these new premises? Maybe the model should be modernized from a practical POV - but I mean in theory - because if it means the foundation can be re-asserted, there should be no reasons in terms of technology not to persue it, right? Or am I missing something? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal