From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Why code completion using CEDET in Emacs so slow? Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:15:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87r52iqawh.fsf@arcor.de> References: <32638310.post@talk.nabble.com> <87zkh6qf7j.fsf@arcor.de> <32640322.post@talk.nabble.com> <87vcruqd7c.fsf@arcor.de> <32640549.post@talk.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318446954 28848 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2011 19:15:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:15:54 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 21:15:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RE4HM-0006Ov-4i for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:15:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RE4HL-0005dI-Bn for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:15:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RE4HH-0005dC-VH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RE4HG-0007H5-Oi for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RE4HG-0007Gv-Ja for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:15:42 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RE4HE-0006J2-UY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:15:40 +0200 Original-Received: from dslc-082-082-175-125.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.82.175.125]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:15:40 +0200 Original-Received: from deng by dslc-082-082-175-125.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:15:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslc-082-082-175-125.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:wwK8mSm88s6RR8J1P9UIW41SPjE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:82535 Archived-At: Judeau writes: > David Engster wrote: >> >> Yes. CEDET is written in Emacs Lisp, so it will always be slower than >> those programs. Still, it should always be usable. Could you provide an >> example file using boost::asio which demonstrates the slow completion? >> >> -David >> > I edited and supplied one example in above post. I'm afraid I can't see any code there. -David