From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Basic legal question: Publication of a fix to psgml Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:02:15 +0400 Message-ID: <87r4isxcs8.fsf@yandex.ru> References: <51584E07.8060709@easy-emacs.de> <87ppydxqh4.fsf@scipolis.de> <515BE043.8030900@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364976164 22921 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2013 08:02:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 03 10:03:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIey-00048b-Bp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:03:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59115 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIeZ-0007q8-Kj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:02:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50193) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIeL-0007op-Oc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:02:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIeE-00066D-7M for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176]:56490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIeE-00065f-18 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:02:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y8so1281411lbh.7 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:02:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus:x-antivirus-status; bh=OXxonUo4xN4hceurwb+qG53FHZAJ9f9/F5E9sMP3qGU=; b=t7asAYeOV2Osu8n+9bcIjCJ/9D4otaRrzTkpJue3MxBufIdq4ss4gk5QpScGCYzPKI dG69v0BPRpGzWi/pk65qndFY2Eu84nhb1q1csxQgwAoAEF9U7fLWzEhkcSJ2Iv85wxM1 JxOFHlGvFryT/FB6Rq9z4V/vULcZL30hFtW78sMQnCIADVflnaYMDq/8vbIgqqO5MejI BPiXDL98X5xI/6wTcA3BEkXR0/c1UVPZAEV9IV32XlmaqkfYBKYEZaB/9pKbPXELHKbJ tV5x685kcAAvonllcH2gwpMHSQmYWoW2qO5Kfx19psgqszP4jVEZ3/TpirmwZVpk652N gOVg== X-Received: by 10.112.28.169 with SMTP id c9mr553707lbh.84.1364976140811; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from SOL ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hk10sm1931534lab.4.2013.04.03.01.02.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:02:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <515BE043.8030900@easy-emacs.de> ("Andreas \=\?utf-8\?Q\?R\=C3\=B6h\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?ler\=22's\?\= message of "Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:54:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130401-0, 01.04.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.176 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:89922 Archived-At: Andreas R=C3=B6hler writes: > In which way a CA-paper could avoid that? > What about the opposite danger: a company signs, provides crucial parts a= nd withdraws CA? > See current discussions at emacs-devel on a lower scale. You cannot withdraw the assignment for code that's already accepted. That's the whole reason why that discussion on emacs-devel still hasn't stopped.