From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: no gnupg directory under elpa? Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:33:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87r43es0wq.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <87tx8bsvp4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401269452 6137 80.91.229.3 (28 May 2014 09:30:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 09:30:52 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 28 11:30:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WpaC4-0001da-Pp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 11:30:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40638 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpaC4-0007vX-DA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 05:30:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpaBj-0007ts-Az for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 05:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpaBb-0003IT-Vc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 05:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp206.alice.it ([82.57.200.102]:36558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpaBb-0003IN-Kb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 05:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (95.232.71.92) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 529A678F22516C27 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 11:30:14 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpaEq-0003E1-28 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 11:33:36 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87tx8bsvp4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Tue, 27 May 2014 12:16:07 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.102 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:97908 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Eric Abrahamsen () Tue, 27 May 2014 12:16:07 +0800 Have I missed some step in package initialization, or is this just because no one has provided signatures with their packages? AFAICT (from "grep sig elpa/admin/*"), ELPA does not produce signatures. I don't know if individual packages do so. (My contributions are not signed because i wasn't even aware of this package.el aspect until now, and there is no mention in the ELPA README.) BTW, i agree that the red "unsigned" field is somewhat disconcerting! just (require 'package) and then a couple of (add-to-list 'package-archives) statements. What do you see for packages installed from archives other than ELPA? =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOFrWkACgkQZwMiJEyAdQL0OQCcC/oc18Mmkrodkcd56maJj3v7 MgAAnR3Mz5J+4Uqy0QZ0lRLgO5pEAGP/ =oOWr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--