From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 22:09:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87r28zqy2r.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <83v9yb92c7.fsf@gnu.org> <878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net> <83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9438xgd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="249110"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 15 22:10:06 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hR0E2-0012ix-Df for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 22:10:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41801 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hR0E1-00044c-Ck for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 16:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hR0De-00044L-RG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 16:09:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hR0Dd-00028w-5o for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 16:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=38724 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hR0Dc-00027s-VO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 16:09:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hR0Da-0012DG-Rj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 22:09:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:lXizMEtbyBNrqV4ynmhE4uihHtI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120417 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > "Outside Savannah" is not relevant when we talk about Emacs. If people are implementing the features but can't be integrated in stock Emacs, the Savannah boundary becomes relevant. >> Assuming that the authors have no problem assigning their copyrights >> to FSF, what prevents the outside work from being integrated into >> Emacs in Savannah to improve Emacs's C++ IDE features? > > Under those assumptions, and if that work doesn't use any non-free > software, nothing. Unfortunately, this is not true.