From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: why is my cd command on eshell on Windows so slow? Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:32:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1j9dlsh.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <86r1jaqdia.fsf@protonmail.com> <83r1javyvo.fsf@gnu.org> <86sg3qouli.fsf@protonmail.com> <86sg3p6aal.fsf@protonmail.com> <86a6px5n7v.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15631"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:oW6RjskvoJKRx5w34NcJ5qJFZp8= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 17 16:33:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lXm0j-0003wC-QW for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:33:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXm0i-0007Mb-U9 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:33:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXlzk-0007MV-Lw for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:32:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:41684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXlzi-0007Lp-2i for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:32:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lXlzg-0002kS-0b for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:32:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:129019 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> ...does not make any noticeable change. >> >> [...] >> >> Sorry! It does make a noticeable change. Your patch seems to solve the >> problem quite well for me. I believe this is case closed. Thank you >> for the marvelous patch. > > I'm glad I saw your message yesterday at a bad time and decided > to "reply to it later" ;-) So the problem is fixed in master but not in emacs-27. Is it planned to be backported to the later? It is a regression.