From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Unknown <unknown@unknown.invalid>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: RE: shell-command causes problems with absolute/relative paths in TAGS
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:53:14 +0100
Message-ID: <87pqeynlad.fsf@shi.workgroup>
References: <20120102223315.3E60F1810C9@neo.msri.org>
	<408087A3D7BE475B884C0F93CE2298C7@us.oracle.com>
	<AA798C0D220E44E5B798734A70C4CF93@EUROPE.ROOT.PRI>
	<20120105054142.GA10149@hysteria.proulx.com>
	<9C2570562E2A4B7BBDA61F564FCFC83F@EUROPE.ROOT.PRI>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325786231 23005 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 17:57:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:57:11 +0000 (UTC)
To: David Chappaz <david.chappaz@free.fr>, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 18:57:07 2012
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RirYo-0007V8-9F
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:57:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50973 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RirYn-00041h-3s
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:57:05 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52607)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1RiqZQ-0001Vv-O9
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:53:46 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1RiqZI-0000WH-AM
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:53:40 -0500
Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:41098)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1RiqZH-0000Mr-Oz
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:53:32 -0500
Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Jan 2012 16:53:16 -0000
Original-Received: from p54BE203D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO shi.workgroup) [84.190.32.61]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 05 Jan 2012 17:53:16 +0100
X-Authenticated: #19296480
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX193lPBmiyh3DEGGtEepkz3FZSvB3JgseIMgBQVjbq
	pNutd8n1qeBYmS
Original-Received: from grfz by shi.workgroup with local (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>)
	id 1RiqZ0-0000SG-3C; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:53:14 +0100
Original-From: Gregor Zattler <Gregor@shi>
In-Reply-To: <9C2570562E2A4B7BBDA61F564FCFC83F@EUROPE.ROOT.PRI>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Mail-Followup-To: David Chappaz <david.chappaz@free.fr>, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 213.165.64.23
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:57:01 -0500
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:83355
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/83355>

Hi David,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:20:30 -0000, "David Chappaz" <david.chappaz@free.fr> wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Please don't hijack discussion threads.
[...]


> Out of curiosity, is there any way to move this discussion in a new thread,
> or is it too late ?

It's too late: Threading of emails is done with respect to their
header (References:, In-Reply-To:) information.  This happens on
ones computer.  In order to move part of a thread one would have
to change header information of all local copies of relevant
emails on all computers of all recipents...

For individual purposes the mail user agent "mutt" for instance
lets users decide to break threads.  After breaking thei are
shown as two distinct threads -- but only on this users local
copy of emails. 

Ciao, Gregor