From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Another Emacs incompatibilty Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn7owmjn.fsf@ebih.ebihd> References: <86r1s648dc.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <86wo1xz4lt.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <83imdhgsqo.fsf@gnu.org> <86blj9xc2z.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <87blj8gbmh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878secyj10.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <875z9gg5qm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83sgckftm5.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10843"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:6tEOnWqRQdC8BgDbm5oevKvuZBU= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 18 07:28:31 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k7uAg-0002id-Mt for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:28:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7uAf-00065o-PA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:28:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7uAI-00065b-3d for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214]:36012 helo=ciao.gmane.io) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7uAG-0006pX-JI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k7uAD-0002A0-AX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:28:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/18 00:17:05 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:123708 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> apparently it's useful enough to have been >> implemented twice! > > CUA Mode comes with a lot of other baggage, whereas > delete-selection-mode only does this one job. > Not everyone want the full CUA. Hold on, I think I'm onto something. What if both cua-mode _and_ delete-selection-mode were removed from Emacs? Wouldn't that solve the OP's problem? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal