From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Emacs as a translator's tool
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 13:59:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87o8ptydil.fsf@ebih.ebihd>
References: <871rn35lqc.fsf@mbork.pl> <87zh9r45ad.fsf@mbork.pl>
 <87h7vz2m5g.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87d06k4rmg.fsf@mbork.pl>
 <87eeqzmanl.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <877dwmoboq.fsf@mbork.pl>
 <87bllypckg.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87tuzpmnuo.fsf@mbork.pl>
 <87bllu4lx0.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87blluxfcq.fsf@mbork.pl>
 <1rmqrrvn.fsf@ebih.ebihd>
Reply-To: Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="86976"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NJP5OnkNAM/0f4s+F06WAxm+KKY=
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 08 13:59:43 2020
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jiGRK-000MW5-L5
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 13:59:42 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jiGRJ-0000bc-NO
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 07:59:41 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35330)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1jiGR2-0000bQ-F8
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 07:59:24 -0400
Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:58942)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1jiGR0-0006Hl-HR
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 07:59:24 -0400
Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1jiGQx-000M8M-CO
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 13:59:19 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Mail-Copies-To: never
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.69.161.202;
 envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/08 07:08:30
X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS   = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Spam_score_int: -16
X-Spam_score: -1.7
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs"
 <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:123277
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/123277>

> It works, check out this dump:
>   <https://dataswamp.org/~incal/pimgs/cat.png>

One thing tho, M. Helary said something about the
chopping up of the input into segments, my intuition
tells me they are shorter (the input more
segmentized) than what you get with
`forward-sentence' and `backward-sentence'. (My
intuition also tells me backward-sentence is
(forward-sentence -1) ...)

Maybe `sentence-end' already has been configured
somewhere to get the most restrictive definition,
i.e., here, with the purpose of getting the shortest
possible segments that still make sense...

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal