From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs as a translator's tool Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 13:59:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8ptydil.fsf@ebih.ebihd> References: <871rn35lqc.fsf@mbork.pl> <87zh9r45ad.fsf@mbork.pl> <87h7vz2m5g.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87d06k4rmg.fsf@mbork.pl> <87eeqzmanl.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <877dwmoboq.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bllypckg.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87tuzpmnuo.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bllu4lx0.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87blluxfcq.fsf@mbork.pl> <1rmqrrvn.fsf@ebih.ebihd> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="86976"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:NJP5OnkNAM/0f4s+F06WAxm+KKY= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 08 13:59:43 2020 Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>) id 1jiGRK-000MW5-L5 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 13:59:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>) id 1jiGRJ-0000bc-NO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 07:59:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>) id 1jiGR2-0000bQ-F8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 07:59:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:58942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>) id 1jiGR0-0006Hl-HR for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 07:59:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>) id 1jiGQx-000M8M-CO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 13:59:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.69.161.202; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/08 07:08:30 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-gnu-emacs>, <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs> List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>, <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org> Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:123277 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/123277> > It works, check out this dump: > <https://dataswamp.org/~incal/pimgs/cat.png> One thing tho, M. Helary said something about the chopping up of the input into segments, my intuition tells me they are shorter (the input more segmentized) than what you get with `forward-sentence' and `backward-sentence'. (My intuition also tells me backward-sentence is (forward-sentence -1) ...) Maybe `sentence-end' already has been configured somewhere to get the most restrictive definition, i.e., here, with the purpose of getting the shortest possible segments that still make sense... -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal