From: Sacha Chua <sacha@free.net.ph>
Subject: Re: emacs or xemacs?
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:35:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87n0qohkz4.fsf@sachac.linuxboxen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u65xdylfl.fsf@raibau.raiffeisen.at> (Klaus Berndl's message of "11 Sep 2002 10:34:06 +0200")
Klaus Berndl <Klaus.Berndl@raibau.raiffeisen.at> writes:
> AFAIK this not correct: XEmacs has this nifty net-installer ported from Cygwin
> to the needs of XEmacs whereas GNU Emacs must still be installed by
> downloading one big archive (regardless of source-distrib or precompiled
> binaries), extracing it, reading the READMe and so on...
apt-get install emacs21
.. and then apt-get install any of the Emacs packages I want, or
download the .els or source archives and play with them myself.
I love Debian. =)
I understand that the binary distribution of Emacs is also easy to
install if you're using RPMs.
--
Sacha Chua <sacha@free.net.ph> - 4 BS CS Ateneo geekette
interests: emacs, gnu/linux, wearables, teaching compsci
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-11 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1031674809.15931.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-10 17:34 ` emacs or xemacs? Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 18:57 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:04 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-09-10 20:40 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:48 ` No HTML mails in Gnus (was: emacs or xemacs?) Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 21:06 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 19:05 ` emacs or xemacs? Stefan Monnier <foo@acm.com>
2002-09-11 7:51 ` Adam
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:34 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-11 10:35 ` Sacha Chua [this message]
2002-09-11 22:25 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 8:29 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-12 9:14 ` Zhongtao Zhu
2002-09-12 14:23 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 19:33 ` maierh
2002-09-12 15:51 ` D. Goel
2002-09-11 21:36 ` Rodney Sparapani
2005-05-22 21:14 Emacs or XEmacs? JS
2005-05-22 21:28 ` David Kastrup
2005-05-22 23:30 ` Tim Johnson
2005-05-23 5:23 ` It's me FKtPp ;)
2005-05-23 16:09 ` Drew Adams
2005-05-23 18:23 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] <mailman.1031732603.1996.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-14 8:33 ` emacs or xemacs? A. L. Meyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-10 16:18 Aurelio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87n0qohkz4.fsf@sachac.linuxboxen.org \
--to=sacha@free.net.ph \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).