From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Fixed order of headers in Rmail messages Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:37:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87mtizt8sk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czjvyaul.fsf@mother.org> <87r18btf7f.fsf@gnu.org> <834k57upvw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3437"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.7.7; emacs 29.0.50 Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 10 09:59:33 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nI5Ib-0000nE-6z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:59:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nI5Ia-0003KY-3T for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:59:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nI4zB-0000G8-39 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:39:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=51358 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nI4z9-0001Vb-GS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:39:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-reply-to:Date:Subject:To:From: References; bh=hif+5X9AaPrXC47gtZq+KVssnHWcsoJIMTgyvjlsJ8c=; b=FU4t+iMAh59zTT ZDgV6Ze787BcM3eubSdlhkzggeD49+NFOddAiJxSMBoMnVWmyXjtcUguEZ+EzQTHYDC7DZohGZhhC ClEOdXg/FHukBGYlBrFLUxQTu3+tFyBnD+l7Bri7got3qT2TkgRsAM8hwMcGT/JFFXmDVrJY3iEi1 1SdJxkij5P7btzRkWwYntnVjhZ64lg3EfyJa3kdiIMNO7WaKrJm/qTLM1bItL7sZ5ZxCxI6qPja9G WXxBz6NK15HTWauW4OZsQZJZsymrSmXGOaSHAbdlJh/7j5gZwUNJY1SI8Hg8UM1LdlIe+rDFF0VjH t9Cj4GQPCVv2XrT6WAIQ==; Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:51501) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nI4z8-0002r8-Ab; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:39:27 -0500 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DB927C0054; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:39:25 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:39:25 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddriedtgdduvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhi lhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepve evieekteekveeigfefffeivdetgeduvdffueeuudevgedttdehvdfhueevfffhnecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomh gvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdel kedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:39:25 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <834k57upvw.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:135881 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The obvious reason you've mentioned is that rmail just shows your >> gazillion-mails MBOX file and narrows it down to a single message and >> its interesting headers. > > This is not how Rmail works nowadays. Ah, alright, I didn't know that has changed but simply assumed it's still the case because buffer-file-name in an Rmail buffer is the mbox file. Bye, Tassilo