From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: mbork@mbork.pl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [External] : Re: How to get all commands defined in a specified file (or files)? Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:00:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87msi5whus.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87zfm5woji.fsf@mbork.pl> <86ttcdikwz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16538"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 11 23:01:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tAcTL-00047l-1P for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:01:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAcT8-000507-Sr; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:01:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAcT7-0004zR-1V for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:01:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAcT4-0003nK-1d; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:01:08 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B536957033; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:01:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdsZuXYqDB2k; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:01:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [89.151.23.235]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EADC3BBF66D; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:00:59 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:38:42 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.110.48.8; envelope-from=mbork@mbork.pl; helo=mail.mojserwer.eu X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:148319 Archived-At: On 2024-11-11, at 20:38, Drew Adams wrote: >> > say that I'd like to define a `execute-extended-command' alternative >> > which would only allow to run commands defined in a specified file. >> How >> > can I get all such commands? I know about `symbol-file', but I don't >> > know how it works (and it's complicated enough that I'm not sure I >> want >> > to study it ATM;-) - I tried to instrument it for edebug, but a quick >> > run revealed only that it's pretty mysterious). I also looked at the >> > property plist of a function name and saw that the filename is not >> kept >> > there. Any hints? >> >> We have a facility to mark commands as relevant to a major mode or a >> list of major modes. If your file defines a major mode, you can use >> this for doing what you want. See the command >> execute-extended-command-for-buffer. A more general facility is the >> variable read-extended-command-predicate. > > Maybe also... > > Has the file been loaded, so the commands are already defined? > Or are they at least autoloaded? Let's assume they are loaded, though if it worked for autoloaded functions, too, it would be even better. > Does the file use a library-specific prefix for all of its > function names? Definitely not. > If so, you can filter all commands (`commandp') according > to that library prefix. I'm not sure what you mean here -- isn't `commandp' way too general here? Best, -- Marcin Borkowski https://mbork.pl https://crimsonelevendelightpetrichor.net/