* Emacs and lilypond
@ 2016-03-03 22:12 Phillip Lord
2016-03-05 16:24 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2016-03-05 17:44 ` Robert Thorpe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Phillip Lord @ 2016-03-03 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
I've just been trying lilypond with Emacs, and the situation seems
fairly poor.
Currently, it appears there no modes on any of the package repos. There
is a mode distributed with lilypond itself, but this looks fairly old
(it has emacs-19 compatability code), is not namespace clean and some of
the functionality is broken.
There is also https://github.com/nsceaux/lyqi, again not on a package
repo, and described by the author as "buggy".
Then, https://github.com/jmgpena/lilypond-mode, which is the lilypond
distributed mode but updated.
And, finally, https://github.com/jstamant/lilypond-mode which is a new
mode.
Any feedback on the best route to go!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs and lilypond
2016-03-03 22:12 Emacs and lilypond Phillip Lord
@ 2016-03-05 16:24 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2016-03-07 14:29 ` Phillip Lord
2016-03-05 17:44 ` Robert Thorpe
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Jolitz @ 2016-03-05 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes:
> I've just been trying lilypond with Emacs, and the situation seems
> fairly poor.
>
> Currently, it appears there no modes on any of the package repos. There
> is a mode distributed with lilypond itself, but this looks fairly old
> (it has emacs-19 compatability code), is not namespace clean and some of
> the functionality is broken.
>
> There is also https://github.com/nsceaux/lyqi, again not on a package
> repo, and described by the author as "buggy".
>
> Then, https://github.com/jmgpena/lilypond-mode, which is the lilypond
> distributed mode but updated.
>
> And, finally, https://github.com/jstamant/lilypond-mode which is a new
> mode.
>
> Any feedback on the best route to go!
I once used Lilypond with Org Babel to create something like an "Org-mode
Bandbook", that is an Org document that contains all of the songs a band
plays, as well as contact info of the band members, and the bands tour
and rehearsal schedule:
,----
| https://github.com/tj64/org-bandbook
`----
I based it on the great Openbook project from Mark Veltzer:
,----
| https://github.com/veltzer/openbook
`----
There are (syntax) transformation functions for both directions - from
Openbook files to Org-mode files and vice versa. And I made use of
Lilyponds (musical) transformation facilities, making it easy to print
such a bandbook for different instrumentalists (C-Version, Bb-Version,
Eb-Version etc.).
IIRC I left it in a working state, but the results had a very plain
latex textbook look.
If I have a practical use case for it, I will continue to develop it and
look for a nice latex style, in the meantime I would be happy if others
become interested in the project and contribute.
The nice thing is that all the hard work is done by others:
- the Openbook project converts sheet music to lilypond
- Org-mode replaces Lilypond Book and allows to create very
sophisticated documents around the scores
I would say that building on the current state of the project, creating
a really beautiful Bandbook (for C and transposing instruments) that is
easy to modify and maintain, would require mostly good Org-mode and
Latex skills, not so much Elisp or Lilypond skills (as long as the songs
are from Openbook or so.)
But with regards to the original question: using Org Babel, its just
about editing plain Lilypond code in source blocks, and I did not get so
involved that I noticed any shortcomnings of lilypond-mode.el. All the
compilation stuff was handled nicely by ob-lilypond in the background.
--
cheers,
Thorsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs and lilypond
2016-03-03 22:12 Emacs and lilypond Phillip Lord
2016-03-05 16:24 ` Thorsten Jolitz
@ 2016-03-05 17:44 ` Robert Thorpe
2016-03-05 19:00 ` Drew Adams
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Thorpe @ 2016-03-05 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Phillip Lord; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes:
> I've just been trying lilypond with Emacs, and the situation seems
> fairly poor.
One of the Lilypond developers is also an Emacs developer. If you
search the archives of emacs-devel you should find who that is. They
should be able to help you fix that.
BR,
Robert Thorpe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Emacs and lilypond
2016-03-05 17:44 ` Robert Thorpe
@ 2016-03-05 19:00 ` Drew Adams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2016-03-05 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Thorpe, phillip.lord; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
> One of the Lilypond developers is also an Emacs developer. If you
> search the archives of emacs-devel you should find who that is.
> They should be able to help you fix that.
David Kastrup.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs and lilypond
2016-03-05 16:24 ` Thorsten Jolitz
@ 2016-03-07 14:29 ` Phillip Lord
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Phillip Lord @ 2016-03-07 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thorsten Jolitz; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com> writes:
>
> I once used Lilypond with Org Babel to create something like an "Org-mode
> Bandbook", that is an Org document that contains all of the songs a band
> plays, as well as contact info of the band members, and the bands tour
> and rehearsal schedule:
>
> ,----
> | https://github.com/tj64/org-bandbook
> `----
>
> I based it on the great Openbook project from Mark Veltzer:
>
> ,----
> | https://github.com/veltzer/openbook
> `----
>
> There are (syntax) transformation functions for both directions - from
> Openbook files to Org-mode files and vice versa. And I made use of
> Lilyponds (musical) transformation facilities, making it easy to print
> such a bandbook for different instrumentalists (C-Version, Bb-Version,
> Eb-Version etc.).
>
> IIRC I left it in a working state, but the results had a very plain
> latex textbook look.
> If I have a practical use case for it, I will continue to develop it and
> look for a nice latex style, in the meantime I would be happy if others
> become interested in the project and contribute.
>
> The nice thing is that all the hard work is done by others:
> - the Openbook project converts sheet music to lilypond
> - Org-mode replaces Lilypond Book and allows to create very
> sophisticated documents around the scores
>
> I would say that building on the current state of the project, creating
> a really beautiful Bandbook (for C and transposing instruments) that is
> easy to modify and maintain, would require mostly good Org-mode and
> Latex skills, not so much Elisp or Lilypond skills (as long as the songs
> are from Openbook or so.)
>
> But with regards to the original question: using Org Babel, its just
> about editing plain Lilypond code in source blocks, and I did not get so
> involved that I noticed any shortcomnings of lilypond-mode.el. All the
> compilation stuff was handled nicely by ob-lilypond in the background.
That looks like a fairly nice option, thanks for the info.
Phil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-07 14:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-03 22:12 Emacs and lilypond Phillip Lord
2016-03-05 16:24 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2016-03-07 14:29 ` Phillip Lord
2016-03-05 17:44 ` Robert Thorpe
2016-03-05 19:00 ` Drew Adams
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).