From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnu.org>
To: help-gnu-emacs <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: url-retrieve-synchronously results differ from curl
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:00:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iofzkx4k.fsf@zigzag.favinet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAdUY-+79PAux9=cHARsHuV=j=ZHVTPSqKvjp8dAftE=pOCOkg@mail.gmail.com> (Artur Malabarba's message of "Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:14:56 -0200")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1250 bytes --]
() Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com>
() Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:14:56 -0200
I'll see if I can find out where this happens in url.el.
If not, I'll just file a bug report. IMHO, the package
should either support both versions indiscriminately, or
warn the user if they use the wrong version.
This is not a legitimate complaint. HTTP specifies the
all-upcase spelling explicitly, so url.el DTRT already.
(Nod to pedants: Actually, RFC1945 sez "The method is
case-sensitive." and lists "POST" in the RHS in the
‘Method’ non-terminal production...)
If anything, a bug-report is indicated for the server side:
unrecognized method names should ellicit status code 501
(error; "not implemented").
Even better (as Sean suggests) would be to support and
encourage the use of symbols.
This is a separate issue, but legitimate. Personally, i'd love
to see more symbols and fewer strings-as-symbols, all around.
(Insert rant on languages lacking a "symbol" data type, here.)
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
(if you're human and you know it)
read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
(not (via 'mailing-list)))
=> nil
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 2:28 url-retrieve-synchronously results differ from curl Artur Malabarba
2015-01-20 7:37 ` Nicolas Richard
2015-01-20 15:35 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-01-21 7:13 ` Nicolas Richard
2015-01-21 13:14 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-01-21 13:42 ` Nicolas Richard
2015-01-21 14:27 ` Sean Allred
2015-01-21 16:29 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2015-01-22 1:14 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-01-22 2:41 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-01-22 9:00 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen [this message]
2015-01-21 8:01 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2015-01-21 14:14 ` Artur Malabarba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87iofzkx4k.fsf@zigzag.favinet \
--to=ttn@gnu.org \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).