* Counterpart to time-to-days?
@ 2019-05-29 12:20 Tim Landscheidt
2019-05-29 21:03 ` Bruno Barbier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Landscheidt @ 2019-05-29 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
Hi,
prologue: With GNU Emacs 26.1, I have a list of UTC time-
stamp pairs that I want to transpose to the Europe/Berlin
time zone and group by a calculated "day" to print a shift-
plan. For example, 2019-05-29T17:45:00Z gets (currently)
transformed to something similar to '(29 19 45), while
2019-05-29T22:30:00Z gets transformed to '(29 24 30) and
2019-05-30T03:30:00Z to '(29 29 30). This part works just
fine.
Now I want to group and display them by week and day. So I
applied time-to-days to the transposed timestamps (and then
planned to calculate the preceding Mondays for the minimum
and maximum days and iterate between them), but when I want-
ed to reconvert the day numbers with the fitting-by-name
days-to-time to display it as a date I hit the following id-
iosyncrasy:
| ELISP> (format-time-string "%F" (current-time))
| "2019-05-29"
| ELISP> (format-time-string "%F" (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time))))
| "3988-05-29"
| ELISP>
So time-to-days seems to count the days from 0001-12-31bce,
while days-to-time (without being explicit about it) seems
to treat days as counting from epoch (1970-01-01).
What is the intended counterpart to time-to-days? How is
date arithmetic supposed to be done in Emacs Lisp?
TIA,
Tim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Counterpart to time-to-days?
2019-05-29 12:20 Counterpart to time-to-days? Tim Landscheidt
@ 2019-05-29 21:03 ` Bruno Barbier
2019-05-30 13:52 ` Tim Landscheidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Barbier @ 2019-05-29 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim Landscheidt, help-gnu-emacs
Hi,
Tim Landscheidt <tim@tim-landscheidt.de> writes:
> Hi,
>
...
> | ELISP> (format-time-string "%F" (current-time))
> | "2019-05-29"
> | ELISP> (format-time-string "%F" (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time))))
> | "3988-05-29"
> | ELISP>
>
> So time-to-days seems to count the days from 0001-12-31bce,
> while days-to-time (without being explicit about it) seems
> to treat days as counting from epoch (1970-01-01).
>
> What is the intended counterpart to time-to-days?
Are you looking for `time-to-number-of-days` ?
(format-time-string "%F" (days-to-time (time-to-number-of-days (current-time))))
=> 2019-05-29
Bruno
> How is date arithmetic supposed to be done in Emacs Lisp?
>
> TIA,
> Tim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Counterpart to time-to-days?
2019-05-29 21:03 ` Bruno Barbier
@ 2019-05-30 13:52 ` Tim Landscheidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Landscheidt @ 2019-05-30 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno Barbier; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
Bruno Barbier <brubar.cs@gmail.com> wrote:
>> | ELISP> (format-time-string "%F" (current-time))
>> | "2019-05-29"
>> | ELISP> (format-time-string "%F" (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time))))
>> | "3988-05-29"
>> | ELISP>
>> So time-to-days seems to count the days from 0001-12-31bce,
>> while days-to-time (without being explicit about it) seems
>> to treat days as counting from epoch (1970-01-01).
>> What is the intended counterpart to time-to-days?
> Are you looking for `time-to-number-of-days` ?
> (format-time-string "%F" (days-to-time (time-to-number-of-days (current-time))))
> => 2019-05-29
Thanks, that works. (Now on for some time zone mangling …)
Tim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-30 13:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-29 12:20 Counterpart to time-to-days? Tim Landscheidt
2019-05-29 21:03 ` Bruno Barbier
2019-05-30 13:52 ` Tim Landscheidt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).