From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Weird font problem Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:16:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87h6ds9e6z.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86y17jsusk.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86ed9bk1z1.fsf@gnu.org> <868qzjgl6g.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86msnyiqmu.fsf@gnu.org> <86msny1r07.fsf@fastmail.fm> <861q5aidjy.fsf@gnu.org> <865xum1g12.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86o782vcfw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 17 10:17:22 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sJ7YH-0001RU-RS for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:17:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJ7Xf-0000lG-Sb; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:16:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJ7Xe-0000l2-6R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJ7Xc-0004q5-Nu; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:16:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ec1ac1aed2so27200531fa.3; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:16:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718612198; x=1719216998; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date :gmane-reply-to-list:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=17HkpRM9czYIxkuMeoxf3mVQPfbkiSNtUTGS78E5Cew=; b=ISHwuu472OS5h1949WSiKJVt086cF/AYpkKLjKFqwPIlrpch86KLQKi79pcfUq6Q14 9fHff+D/ZaJ9gb7boIAqY2O/z57n2OLN+Mtm3JMB/x0Qx5BdOG0N7mf51i1nwKxWrjyU TGYW0QJKlQ48m/e3o5hXfOQHnTKiMoZHYYMGX8lc8u5hthl9fTgxUEoK72iUuIjFDECG 9R7dUNH81EHgdlGWJ2RtG4HIKGhX581dh6s7cFuoszksDe39vUVHUvTp9VIAZu0H3e4x 8VzMgC785DVpDkBLhPI9P8ueUOpdrk+QhDfBL3/IhUCsuWXTkdKoZoJ9jrvZUDW2rg4v nW7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718612198; x=1719216998; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date :gmane-reply-to-list:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=17HkpRM9czYIxkuMeoxf3mVQPfbkiSNtUTGS78E5Cew=; b=bHLVHAEsvLfOuLKkDKEvt3ziu8lffFYApkLtoNrt6jguhcEZGyAysctmZ64HWq2D0q p2xTnEuTmHgtE/J4rzXsHgROWhobBvtOhmX8WMT0+2pUzTT6Pw+oJYK0tTQszPWFML+9 POYAwgduxaNKyMSgc7ESc9VdEEK82CaglCFStRlLjajglDPGWhb1pEsKypHwVfwd+gkO aKrzcM+uiZZSISzKACXJcZGD6H5wId3XiNPnAqWxpssxCNWpBQTSHvt0aZYaDrDWrBcB XZN/N+4AifB+cA8gltKyBBcmZtBYwedhtYVXW/LOoj3SNKenwxnk+nZoh86rXfAAoQLO r73A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx7GWnoyzBAGjESi75+68zWd6JlwCHwSBJNAhI3lX3TcvJ3QNDc d+C/EuYnUDrYaYIeLJoO7udYgKHteFH5gOsgaNkKtimj9UW4rhoRD1D0GA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG00UD/GiPWfGH1APnhtqeehwKHSLxjuWJMQ9rZDJcUxCtQmclnKn1LD7GIRIzSRLxrktS3KA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a601:0:b0:2ec:18e5:e68f with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ec18e5e82fmr52601751fa.33.1718612197640; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3607509c8acsm11246836f8f.48.2024.06.17.01.16.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:16:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86o782vcfw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:26:43 +0300") Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::235; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x235.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:146902 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:26:43 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: Eli> I suspect it's the fact that orderless defines all faces to have t= he Eli> 'bold' weight, and the font you are using for these characters has Eli> only the bold weight and doesn't have the "regular" weight. Fonts are weird: I have one here which has a bold version, it displays '(:weight bold) differently from regular, but when you query the font used, it claims it=CA=BCs using 'regular' weight. E pur si muove. `display-supports-face-attributes-p' claims that it doesn=CA=BCt support ":weight bold", but that it *does* support ":slant bold". I don=CA=BCt think that=CA=BCs a bug in Emacs, just in the font :-) Robert --=20