How can I made ispell more smarter for some code blocks?

How can I made ispell more smarter for some code blocks?

[Hongxu Chen]

Hi all,

   I use aspell for spell-check when I writing notes with markdown/org
   or simple emails. What annoys me that it just checks too
   much. For instance, it even checks the content inside code-blocks in
   org mode, which is false positive terminologically. So is there way
   to make it smarter?

Thanks,
Hongxu Chen

Re: How can I made ispell more smarter for some code blocks?

[Teemu Likonen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 938 bytes --]

Hongxu Chen [2013-05-15 17:13:17 +08:00] wrote:

> I use aspell for spell-check when I writing notes with markdown/org or
> simple emails. What annoys me that it just checks too much. For
> instance, it even checks the content inside code-blocks in org mode,
> which is false positive terminologically. So is there way to make it
> smarter?

This is an advertisement.

I wanted a smarter and faster spelling checker, so I ended up
implementing wcheck-mode:

https://github.com/tlikonen/wcheck-mode

(Also through Marmalade.)

But wcheck-mode doesn't work well with aspell because aspell buffers its
output. Wcheck-mode works with anything that works line-wise through
standard input and output. Sorry. You could use Enchant as a wrapper for
other spelling checkers.

Wcheck-mode checks only visible text area, that is, no text outside
windows and no invisible text. You can also configure which "faces" it
checks and which ones it skips.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

Re: How can I made ispell more smarter for some code blocks?

[Rasmus]

Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> writes:

> Hongxu Chen [2013-05-15 17:13:17 +08:00] wrote:
>
>> I use aspell for spell-check when I writing notes with markdown/org or
>> simple emails. What annoys me that it just checks too much. For
>> instance, it even checks the content inside code-blocks in org mode,
>> which is false positive terminologically. So is there way to make it
>> smarter?
>
> This is an advertisement.
>
> I wanted a smarter and faster spelling checker, so I ended up
> implementing wcheck-mode:

I only use wcheck these days, and I can quickly switch between
different dictionaries.  I don't know if you could tell wcheck to
ignore stuff wrapped inside

#+BEGIN_SRC something ...
... <to be ignored by wcheck> ...
#+END_SRC 

but I guess it would be possible through regexps.  Possibly, you could
even use org-mode's own regexps.

–Rasmus


-- 
This is the kind of tedious nonsense up with which I will not put

Re: How can I made ispell more smarter for some code blocks?

[Teemu Likonen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 588 bytes --]

<rasmus@gmx.us> [2013-05-15 16:55:32 +02:00] wrote:

> I only use wcheck these days, and I can quickly switch between
> different dictionaries. I don't know if you could tell wcheck to
> ignore stuff wrapped inside
>
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC something ...
> ... <to be ignored by wcheck> ...
> #+END_SRC 

You can configure wcheck-mode to not read faces org-block-begin-line,
org-block and org-block-end-line. There are two ways to configure that.
User can specify which faces are read (the rest are skipped).
Alternately user can configure which faces to skip (the rest are read).

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

Re: How can I made ispell more smarter for some code blocks?

[Hongxu Chen]

Thanks for your introduction. I took a glimpse at the project and found
that the inline docs and README is wonderful, so I also believe this is
a fabulous tool. But I feel that it might not meet my needs and seems
that configuration is a bit difficult due to its flexibility.
But I might have a try.

Many thanks!
Hongxu Chen

Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> writes:

> Hongxu Chen [2013-05-15 17:13:17 +08:00] wrote:
>
>> I use aspell for spell-check when I writing notes with markdown/org or
>> simple emails. What annoys me that it just checks too much. For
>> instance, it even checks the content inside code-blocks in org mode,
>> which is false positive terminologically. So is there way to make it
>> smarter?
>
> This is an advertisement.
>
> I wanted a smarter and faster spelling checker, so I ended up
> implementing wcheck-mode:
>
> https://github.com/tlikonen/wcheck-mode
>
> (Also through Marmalade.)
>
> But wcheck-mode doesn't work well with aspell because aspell buffers its
> output. Wcheck-mode works with anything that works line-wise through
> standard input and output. Sorry. You could use Enchant as a wrapper for
> other spelling checkers.
>
> Wcheck-mode checks only visible text area, that is, no text outside
> windows and no invisible text. You can also configure which "faces" it
> checks and which ones it skips.

-- 
Regards,
Hongxu Chen