From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: torys.anderson@gmail.com (Tory S. Anderson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Anyone have flyspell + autocorrect working? Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:57:54 -0500 Message-ID: <87fvaeyqx9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87egpyipz2.fsf@debian.uxu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423565894 3174 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2015 10:58:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:58:14 +0000 (UTC) To: embe8573@student.uu.se, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 10 11:58:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YL8WC-0000YM-2h for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:58:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39080 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL8WB-0004Xv-Mj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:58:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL8W0-0004Xq-SM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:58:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL8Vx-0007ub-AI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:58:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]:47169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL8Vx-0007uM-64 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:57:57 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 200so8618690ykr.12 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:57:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=mw5j6dNjUztvizL84PxB0I+AQCT3uJe4qBJcwnHL2II=; b=HPR65LcX2OM0jUvi5EETTBiWEaIbFIhMQyM6zYWMjm02FAOc7iMwsIexOR8nAgsl5H Wdk0uaQ9bYJVXhAaTu7XJ2e26UPpby3sjubznp9q6rrp51YNAB6XujqMvU8tm0Fl2sDg 7dcvvHYqHtDfVxpfuPlpS3CBWCOx5aIUN5eUw18slvHe3omPtKuDcFl9+haWqZofGUuM PVpZ7JCQ4fkW4pti5lhTvONrFsoLkn5Comz/46ftZSd9WyeNbzCpOnLvHKNfIk4g5Jcg 76KqRa5VhmzMddDbfMW/zlT/kzbVkjNQfsJBurRbVH4oENBQBXJoLtlE0Rb5dOoFdW03 kz3Q== X-Received: by 10.236.45.10 with SMTP id o10mr8022223yhb.61.1423565876218; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:57:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:0:a602:24aa:ee55:f9ff:feb5:5589]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 46sm9532999yho.54.2015.02.10.02.57.54 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:57:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87egpyipz2.fsf@debian.uxu> (Emanuel Berg's message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:12:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:102614 Archived-At: > on-the-fly spellcheck is a dubious idea to begin with You realize you are upsetting the entire industry standard of Word Processors out there, right? :) I have long agreed with you and used that one-check method for my LaTeX writing; but FlySpell generally "just works" and has proven very useful for things I forget to ispell, like emails and note pages (where later coming back to typos is more distracting to me than correcting them immediately). "Just works", that is, until you try to complement it's look-behind with the AC-ispell "look-ahead". Emanuel Berg writes: > torys.anderson@gmail.com (Tory S. Anderson) writes: > >> I find that trying to have both flyspell and >> autocorrect-ispell working in the same buffer >> results in unusably slow autocorrect behavior; if I >> start a word, it takes up to 5 second for a >> suggestion to appear. I am using the hunspell >> dictionary for both. Upon disabling flyspell, >> ac-ispell works fine. Anyone have these two working >> in tandem? How did you do it? > > No, but on-the-fly spellcheck is a dubious idea to > begin with, at least with the dictionaries I've seen. > I have the iamerican-insane for ispell but it seems > "insane" is meant literally because that's what you > get if you would use it on-the-fly as there are so > many words, acronyms, "fun" spellings, etc. missing. > It is very annoying to have your flow of > typing/thoughts stop and reset all the time, > especially if the word that did it isn't even > incorrectly spelled or actually that unusual at all! > But even for sensible catches it is much better to > just type and think, type and think, and when done, > *then* spellcheck, once.