From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Would there be a drawback of using the same graphical toolkit on every platform? Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 00:02:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87fsoecvf9.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <83tucvz53x.fsf@gnu.org> <83tucuybjr.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28658"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:Dcc+4HmIijIpfdcSsTVmH3fgKIs= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 20 00:06:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nLYng-0007B3-9Z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 00:06:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nLYnf-00060N-5l for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 18:05:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39610) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nLYmp-00060E-8Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 18:05:07 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:37474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nLYmm-0000CO-7n for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 18:05:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nLYmk-0005tP-KZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 00:05:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:136027 Archived-At: Jean Louis wrote: > Quote of RMS: > > That is why I say, if you wish to refer to Unix systems, > that means only those which are true Unix systems, but > does not mean FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, DragonFlyBSD, and > others because such are not Unix systems, they are > Unix-like systems, as they are not registered and > officially recognized as Unix. Oh, so it is just that little thing. Let men the officially recognize on gmane.emacs.help for all to hear that the BSDs are Unix! ... wait ... something is up ... AAAH! I SEE! SO DID ANYONE OF YOU WORTHLESS BUNCH OF GOOD-FOR-NOTHINGS KEEP TRACK ON THE GOD DAMN BINARY DIGITS OF THESE SYSTEMS IN EXECUTION? AND IN PARTICULAR, WHAT UNIX FEATURES CHANGED AND IN WHAT WAYS FROM US SAYING DIFFERENT THINGS AS TO THEIR NATURE? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal