From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Lookarounds and recursion in Emacs regexes Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:25:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87fsbheprx.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87h6wbeti3.fsf@mbork.pl> <877cx7n5an.fsf@dataswamp.org> <878rhelfks.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87mt5tje44.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2015"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:TJ43gu7J+OMyMSL5P9HJt9/mGlA= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 13:40:29 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pPNGt-0000I3-PC for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 13:40:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pPNGl-0001ZR-J7; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 07:40:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pPLAG-00013N-TW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 05:25:31 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pPLA7-0006PS-8n for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 05:25:23 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pPLA3-0008vf-Dk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:25:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 07:40:14 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142635 Archived-At: Jean Louis wrote: >>>>> Although somewhat proficient, I never learnt to >>>>> love Python. >>>> >>>> People don't love Python like they do Lisp, but no doubt >>>> it has it's good sides - development speed not the least. >>> >>> Do you want to say that development speed in Lisp is >>> slower than in Python? >> >> Lisp is a family of languages, if we talk Elisp then Elisp >> is faster for anything Emacs related obviously, if we talk >> everything else then Python is faster. > > Faster for development? Yes, a less skilled Python programmer can do a more advanced application in less time ... > Faster for speed processing by programming language? Actually then Lisp is, or can be, much faster, as Lisp can be as fast as any compiled language. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal