Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism

[Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se>]

Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes:

>> I've not looked at systemd too closely, but AFAICS,
>> the problem is not child-diseases, but more that
>> it's not enough unixy.
>
> It's like an echo. I keep reading this same opinion.
>
> 1. I don't know much about it 2. It's bad.
>
> Spend a little time appreciating the simplicity of
> systemd and then reach your conclusion. In my
> opinion, the design is good and it takes a whole
> bunch of disorganized shell scripts and turns them
> into data. I nice simple, readable data structure.
>
> Is it "unixy"?
>
> As if that word meant something, I'd say yes. It's
> just the right amount of code to solve the problem.

Well, yeah, and regardless of whatever it is
absolutely nothing to get all heated-up about, not to
mention forking Debian which is a farse.

Maybe they did that as a scam just so people would
stop the litany. Now they can tell the whiners - if
you don't like it, join the forked Debian!. (By the
way, I expect that project not exactly to hit the
top-ten list of the Eurovision song contest.)

-- 
underground experts united