From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 16:45:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87ef53vihw.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <20190502214006.4fdsinp7u5xuqvdv@Ergus> <20190503004416.xfuzzucflp6bxpuz@Ergus> <8736lm30lz.fsf@web.de> <864l61j04d.fsf@zoho.eu> <20190511073254.GB29829@tuxteam.de> <04187AB9-AD7D-492D-A890-BCB01848370C@icloud.com> <20190511075712.GD29829@tuxteam.de> <86a7fsfv1m.fsf@zoho.eu> <20190512075448.GA11650@tuxteam.de> <346107E9-590D-4A18-9152-ECFF36FC4EDC@icloud.com> <83r293bvok.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="163291"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 12 17:00:25 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hPpxh-000gMq-OV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:00:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44013 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPpxg-0001gE-Iv for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 11:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPpx1-0001K1-5x for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:59:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPpjg-0003gS-UA for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:45:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=54274 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPpjf-0003d5-7F for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hPpjc-000Q20-Ay for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 16:45:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:HAIxP2p0KE4OK8qHQKTUdkC91iQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120321 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Most stuff Emacs routinely does is something the other editors could > only dream about, so by and large you are comparing apples to peanuts. Examples? Emacs is amazing, but as far as productivity goes, at least as a programmer's editor for popular languages, it is far behind current contenders.