From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Remove auctex from emacs Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 23:28:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87czbpn3ap.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <878rmp6p1a.fsf@mbork.pl> <874jxc7pok.fsf@mbork.pl> <4JPfgfaJhGMNu0GVKlbgdOaYJmX8Cih8WZ6iYJkX-3JCK8QGot58RCyu8yWxajlfxWmXdRuWDy01mv6LkV9TY-Ms4RS_I6-ZvMjJta4_Ss8=@proton.me> <87edw75lq9.fsf@mbork.pl> <87czbq57sz.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3692"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:HNKVzpuJmv/+3RMz1fH5IRCpAcU= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 15:24:34 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1obMBu-0000mv-QA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:24:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obMBt-0000tG-Hn for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oakof-0007CI-K0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:42300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oakod-0004lo-OV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oakob-0001D4-Ov for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 23:30:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:49:33 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:139606 Archived-At: Marcin Borkowski wrote: > Perhaps if you make a compelling argument for such a change > on the AUCTeX mailing list, possibly volunteering to help > with that effort, you might succeed. Personally, I think > that the time would be better spent elsewhere, but this may > be because I didn't think about this issue deeply enough and > cannot see too many disadvantages of the status quo. > Change my mind! ;-) Weren't there two LaTeX modes and the difference was one was a LaTeX IDE with packs and stuff and the other was just a mode with font lock, navigation etc for LaTeX as a language? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal