From: Narendra Joshi <narendraj9@gmail.com>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
Cc: Narendra Joshi <narendraj9@gmail.com>, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Quoted function in `define-key'
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:39:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bmug8nfl.fsf@vicarie.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760korbkj.fsf@drachen> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sun, 05 Feb 2017 14:50:36 +0100")
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
> (info "(elisp) Symbol Components")
How did you insert this link to info?
>
>
>> What does the byte compiler do with this information? I am just
>> curious about this.
>
> When you sharp quote a lambda expression, the compiler knows that this
> lambda list is supposed to be called as a function, and will byte
> compile it. The evaluator might turn it into a closure when lexical
> binding is used.
>
> In elisp, the `lambda' macro comes with implicit function quoting (see
> its definition), so you can just omit it.
>
> But OTOH, it's an error to `quote' lambdas like
>
> '(lambda () body...)
>
> because it will prevent byte compilation or closure creation and make
> Stefan angry.
:)
> Obviously for `function' quoted symbols there is not much to do, but the
> byte compiler can determine whether that function is defined/ will be
> defined at run time, so it can warn you about typos as an extra service.
>
> For example, you get a compiler warning when compiling
>
> (define-key my-map [key] #'make-frame-cmomand)
>
> but not for
>
> (define-key my-map [key] 'make-frame-cmomand)
>
>> If this is recommended, I would also start quoting my functions as
>> #'my-function.
>
> Yes, it's a good idea.
Thanks! This is very informative.
--
Narendra Joshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-05 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-04 10:20 Quoted function in `define-key' Narendra Joshi
2017-02-04 11:11 ` Narendra Joshi
2017-02-04 12:05 ` Michael Heerdegen
2017-02-04 15:03 ` Narendra Joshi
2017-02-04 17:25 ` Michael Heerdegen
2017-02-05 10:10 ` Narendra Joshi
2017-02-05 13:50 ` Michael Heerdegen
2017-02-05 19:09 ` Narendra Joshi [this message]
2017-02-05 19:45 ` Michael Heerdegen
2017-02-04 18:10 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bmug8nfl.fsf@vicarie.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me \
--to=narendraj9@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).